Multivariate analysis of EFS
. | n . | HR (95% CI) . | P . |
---|---|---|---|
Age at allo-HSCT | |||
Agelog10* | 79 | 2.47 (1.14-5.32) | .021 |
Allo-HSCT source | |||
BM | 44 | 1 | |
CB | 15 | 3.03 (0.90-10.36) | .077 |
PB | 19 | 1.92 (0.71-5.14) | .195 |
Donor | |||
MSD | 29 | 1 | |
MUD 10/10 + MFD | 28 | 6.78 (1.93-23.81) | .003 |
MUD 9/10 | 5 | 8.37 (1.85-37.82) | .006 |
MMD (CB + MMFD) | 15 | 4.99 (1.03-24.13) | .045 |
. | n . | HR (95% CI) . | P . |
---|---|---|---|
Age at allo-HSCT | |||
Agelog10* | 79 | 2.47 (1.14-5.32) | .021 |
Allo-HSCT source | |||
BM | 44 | 1 | |
CB | 15 | 3.03 (0.90-10.36) | .077 |
PB | 19 | 1.92 (0.71-5.14) | .195 |
Donor | |||
MSD | 29 | 1 | |
MUD 10/10 + MFD | 28 | 6.78 (1.93-23.81) | .003 |
MUD 9/10 | 5 | 8.37 (1.85-37.82) | .006 |
MMD (CB + MMFD) | 15 | 4.99 (1.03-24.13) | .045 |
Log transformation was used in setting of a Cox regression model, because there was no normal (Gaussian) distribution of the age (age skewness with a range of 0.20-29.46 y with a median of 1.075).