Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of EFS

nHR (95% CI)P
Age at allo-HSCT    
 Agelog10* 79 2.47 (1.14-5.32) .021 
Allo-HSCT source    
 BM 44  
 CB 15 3.03 (0.90-10.36) .077 
 PB 19 1.92 (0.71-5.14) .195 
Donor    
 MSD 29  
 MUD 10/10 + MFD 28 6.78 (1.93-23.81) .003 
 MUD 9/10 8.37 (1.85-37.82) .006 
 MMD (CB + MMFD) 15 4.99 (1.03-24.13) .045 
nHR (95% CI)P
Age at allo-HSCT    
 Agelog10* 79 2.47 (1.14-5.32) .021 
Allo-HSCT source    
 BM 44  
 CB 15 3.03 (0.90-10.36) .077 
 PB 19 1.92 (0.71-5.14) .195 
Donor    
 MSD 29  
 MUD 10/10 + MFD 28 6.78 (1.93-23.81) .003 
 MUD 9/10 8.37 (1.85-37.82) .006 
 MMD (CB + MMFD) 15 4.99 (1.03-24.13) .045 
*

Log transformation was used in setting of a Cox regression model, because there was no normal (Gaussian) distribution of the age (age skewness with a range of 0.20-29.46 y with a median of 1.075).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal