Table 3.

Distribution of CNS status according to first intrathecal therapy with or without total intravenous anesthesia and first CSF examination with conventional cytology or flow cytometry analysis

CNS statusWith flow cytometry analysis, no. (%)With conventional cytology, no. (%)PWith total intravenous anesthesia, no. (%)Without total intravenous anesthesia, no. (%)P
CNS1 1024 (91.4) 6050 (92.8) <.001 827 (94.9) 6247 (92.3) <.001 
CNS2 78 (7.0) 38 (0.6)  9 (1.0) 107 (1.6)  
Traumatic lumbar puncture 11 (1.0) 363 (5.6)  18 (2.1) 356 (5.3)  
CNS3 7 (0.6) 69 (1.1)  17 (2.0) 59 (0.9)  
CNS statusWith flow cytometry analysis, no. (%)With conventional cytology, no. (%)PWith total intravenous anesthesia, no. (%)Without total intravenous anesthesia, no. (%)P
CNS1 1024 (91.4) 6050 (92.8) <.001 827 (94.9) 6247 (92.3) <.001 
CNS2 78 (7.0) 38 (0.6)  9 (1.0) 107 (1.6)  
Traumatic lumbar puncture 11 (1.0) 363 (5.6)  18 (2.1) 356 (5.3)  
CNS3 7 (0.6) 69 (1.1)  17 (2.0) 59 (0.9)  
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal