Table 4.

Relationship between ΔIKZF1 and MRD

IKZF1 WTΔIKZF1IKZF1 plusP*ΔIKZF1 LOFΔIKZF1 DNP,
LOF vs WT/ DN vs WT
PCR    Deleted vs WT    
BCR-ABL1        
  MRD 147 (76.6) 18 (51.4)  .002 8 (50.0) 10 (52.6) .019/.023 
  MRD+ 45 (23.4) 17 (48.6)   8 (50.0) 9 (47.4)  
BCR-ABL1+        
  MRD 42 (60.9) 26 (55.3)  .55 10 (47.6) 16 (61.5) .28/.95 
  MRD+ 27 (39.1) 21 (44.7)   11 (52.4) 10 (38.5)  
MLPA    Deleted vs WT/Deleted vs IKZF1plus    
 BCR-ABL1        
  MRD 112 (76.2) 11 (52.4) 22 (66.7) .021/.26 25 (64.1) 8 (57.1) .12/.50 
  MRD+ 35 (23.8) 10 (47.6) 11 (33.3)  14 (35.9) 6 (42.9)  
 BCR-ABL1+        
  MRD 27 (58.7) 15 (44.1) 22 (75.9) .20/.13 24 (57.1) 13 (65.0) .31/.21 
  MRD+ 19 (41.3) 19 (55.9) 7 (24.1)  18 (42.9) 7 (35.0)  
IKZF1 WTΔIKZF1IKZF1 plusP*ΔIKZF1 LOFΔIKZF1 DNP,
LOF vs WT/ DN vs WT
PCR    Deleted vs WT    
BCR-ABL1        
  MRD 147 (76.6) 18 (51.4)  .002 8 (50.0) 10 (52.6) .019/.023 
  MRD+ 45 (23.4) 17 (48.6)   8 (50.0) 9 (47.4)  
BCR-ABL1+        
  MRD 42 (60.9) 26 (55.3)  .55 10 (47.6) 16 (61.5) .28/.95 
  MRD+ 27 (39.1) 21 (44.7)   11 (52.4) 10 (38.5)  
MLPA    Deleted vs WT/Deleted vs IKZF1plus    
 BCR-ABL1        
  MRD 112 (76.2) 11 (52.4) 22 (66.7) .021/.26 25 (64.1) 8 (57.1) .12/.50 
  MRD+ 35 (23.8) 10 (47.6) 11 (33.3)  14 (35.9) 6 (42.9)  
 BCR-ABL1+        
  MRD 27 (58.7) 15 (44.1) 22 (75.9) .20/.13 24 (57.1) 13 (65.0) .31/.21 
  MRD+ 19 (41.3) 19 (55.9) 7 (24.1)  18 (42.9) 7 (35.0)  
*

P values are χ2. P values for interaction (with BCR-ABL1 status): P = .096 (PCR WT/ΔIKZF1), P = .39 (PCR, WT/LOF/DN), P = .0078 (MLPA WT/ΔIKZF1/IKZF1+), and P = .5 (MLPA, WT/LOF/DN).

For this analysis, negative was grouped together with indeterminate and POQR as this was how patients without a positive result were stratified to treatment.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal