Table 2.

Changes in enrollment diversity after implementation of reporting requirements

StatisticNH-BlackNH-NA/ANNH-AsianHispanic
AML 
 Actual enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 6.4 0.2 4.6 6.5 
 Expected enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 7.8 0.1 5.3 
 OR actual vs expected enrollment 0.79 * 0.83 0.77 
 OR 95% CI 0.65, 0.95 – 0.66, 1.04 0.64, 0.93 
P .01 – .10 .006 
ALL 
 Actual enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 3.6 0.4 3.8 8.7 
 Expected enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 0.5 4.5 25.5 
 OR actual vs expected enrollment 0.35 * 0.61 0.25 
 OR 95% CI 0.15, 0.77 – 0.25, 1.24 0.15, 0.42 
 P 0.01 – .27 <.001 
StatisticNH-BlackNH-NA/ANNH-AsianHispanic
AML 
 Actual enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 6.4 0.2 4.6 6.5 
 Expected enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 7.8 0.1 5.3 
 OR actual vs expected enrollment 0.79 * 0.83 0.77 
 OR 95% CI 0.65, 0.95 – 0.66, 1.04 0.64, 0.93 
P .01 – .10 .006 
ALL 
 Actual enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 3.6 0.4 3.8 8.7 
 Expected enrollment proportion, 2011-2014, % 0.5 4.5 25.5 
 OR actual vs expected enrollment 0.35 * 0.61 0.25 
 OR 95% CI 0.15, 0.77 – 0.25, 1.24 0.15, 0.42 
 P 0.01 – .27 <.001 

Pearson χ2 comparisons between enrollment fractions within each racial-ethnic group for trials enrolling before and after implementation of the reporting requirements (2011-2014). Enrollment was adjusted for changes in incidence and NH-White enrollment between the periods. Significant results are listed in bold. CI, confidence interval.

*

Values too low to perform accurate testing.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal