Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of 164 AML patients studied

CharacteristicsAll patients, (N = 164)No post-CR CH, (N = 85) (% or range)Post-CR CH, (N = 79) (% or range)P*
Sex     
 Female 80 (49) 38 (45) 42 (53) .348 
Age 53 47 57 <.001 
 (17-85) (17-81) (23-85)  
AML subtype     
 De novo 129 (79) 71 (84) 58 (73) .162 
 Secondary 14 (9) 4 (5) 10 (13)  
 Therapy-related 21 (13) 10 (12) 11 (14)  
ELN classification     
 Favorable 36 (22) 21 (25) 15 (19) .806 
 Intermediate 65 (40) 34 (40) 31 (39)  
 Adverse 61 (37) 29 (34) 32 (41)  
Induction therapy     
 High intensity 126 (77) 74 (87) 52 (66) .04 
 Low intensity 38 (23) 11 (13) 27 (34)  
Allo-SCT in −1st CR     
 No 101 (62) 56 (66) 45 (57) .246 
 Yes 63 (38) 29 (34) 34 (43)  
CharacteristicsAll patients, (N = 164)No post-CR CH, (N = 85) (% or range)Post-CR CH, (N = 79) (% or range)P*
Sex     
 Female 80 (49) 38 (45) 42 (53) .348 
Age 53 47 57 <.001 
 (17-85) (17-81) (23-85)  
AML subtype     
 De novo 129 (79) 71 (84) 58 (73) .162 
 Secondary 14 (9) 4 (5) 10 (13)  
 Therapy-related 21 (13) 10 (12) 11 (14)  
ELN classification     
 Favorable 36 (22) 21 (25) 15 (19) .806 
 Intermediate 65 (40) 34 (40) 31 (39)  
 Adverse 61 (37) 29 (34) 32 (41)  
Induction therapy     
 High intensity 126 (77) 74 (87) 52 (66) .04 
 Low intensity 38 (23) 11 (13) 27 (34)  
Allo-SCT in −1st CR     
 No 101 (62) 56 (66) 45 (57) .246 
 Yes 63 (38) 29 (34) 34 (43)  

Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without post-CR CH.

*

Differences in characteristics were tested by Fisher exact test.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal