Table 2.

Construction of a frailty score in the training cohort

HR (95% CI)PScore
ADL    
 Independent  
 Dependent 2.07 (1.59-2.71) <.001 
CCI    
 Score 0-1  
 Score 2 1.53 (1.14-2.04) .004 1.5 
 Score ≥3 1.92 (1.45-2.55) <.001 
GNRI    
 Absent/low  
 Moderate 2.01 (1.49-2.70) <.001 
 Severe 2.31 (1.61-3.30) <.001 2.5 
Age, y    
 <85  
 ≥85 2.25 (1.70-2.98) <.001 
IPI score    
 Low (1)  — 
 Low-intermediate (2) 1.13 (0.72-1.80) .589 — 
 High-intermediate (3) 1.71 (1.13-2.60) .012 — 
 High (4-5) 2.75 (1.83-4.12) <.001 — 
HR (95% CI)PScore
ADL    
 Independent  
 Dependent 2.07 (1.59-2.71) <.001 
CCI    
 Score 0-1  
 Score 2 1.53 (1.14-2.04) .004 1.5 
 Score ≥3 1.92 (1.45-2.55) <.001 
GNRI    
 Absent/low  
 Moderate 2.01 (1.49-2.70) <.001 
 Severe 2.31 (1.61-3.30) <.001 2.5 
Age, y    
 <85  
 ≥85 2.25 (1.70-2.98) <.001 
IPI score    
 Low (1)  — 
 Low-intermediate (2) 1.13 (0.72-1.80) .589 — 
 High-intermediate (3) 1.71 (1.13-2.60) .012 — 
 High (4-5) 2.75 (1.83-4.12) <.001 — 

Multivariate Cox regression analysis with HR for death from all causes (OS), adjusted for IPI score. The model was developed in the training cohort (n = 522 patients). Missing values were imputed using MICE. Follow-up was limited to 2 years for GNRI to obtain proportional hazard, otherwise follow-up was limited to 5 years. Weights for the geriatric assessment variables were obtained by rounding the HR to the closest 0.5 score. The frailty score was then created by multiplication of the rounded HRs, producing a frailty score ranging from 1 to 20.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal