Table 2.

CR treatment effect of tisagenlecleucel vs blinatumomab

MethodOR95% CIP
Unadjusted OR    
 Univariate logistic regression 8.09 3.76-17.38 <.0001 
Marginal OR    
 Logistic regression with sIPTW 7.80 3.66-16.60 <.0001 
 Logistic regression with trimmed sIPTW 7.49 3.52-15.96 <.0001 
Conditional OR (adjusted)    
 Logistic regression stratified by quintiles of propensity score 6.71 3.06-14.71 <.0001 
 Logistic regression adjusting for prognostic factors 9.76 4.09-23.28 <.0001 
 Logistic regression adjusting for prognostic factors and propensity score 9.71 4.03-23.40 <.0001 
MethodOR95% CIP
Unadjusted OR    
 Univariate logistic regression 8.09 3.76-17.38 <.0001 
Marginal OR    
 Logistic regression with sIPTW 7.80 3.66-16.60 <.0001 
 Logistic regression with trimmed sIPTW 7.49 3.52-15.96 <.0001 
Conditional OR (adjusted)    
 Logistic regression stratified by quintiles of propensity score 6.71 3.06-14.71 <.0001 
 Logistic regression adjusting for prognostic factors 9.76 4.09-23.28 <.0001 
 Logistic regression adjusting for prognostic factors and propensity score 9.71 4.03-23.40 <.0001 

OR is the odds ratio of tisagenlecleucel vs blinatumomab. An OR >1 indicates that tisagenlecleucel is associated with a higher odds of response than blinatumomab.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal