Table 1.

Overview of first-salvage chemotherapy regimens since 2010

StudyNInterventionRefractory, n (%)CR pre-ASCTORR pre-ASCTPFSOS
Josting et al (2010)13  (RCT) 279 DHAP 0 (0) CT: 24% CT: 71% 3 years: 69% (no significant difference between arms) 3 years: 85% (no significant difference between arms) 
Moskowitz et al (2010)14  105 ICE 48 (46) PET/gallium: 61%
CT: 33% 
CT: 59% 4 years: 56% 4 years: 72% 
Moskowitz et al (2012)11  97 ICE + GVD (PET-adapted sequential) 41 (42) PET: 60% after ICE
78% after GVD 
— 51 months: 70% 51 months: 80% 
Labrador et al (2014)15  (retrospective) 82 ESHAP 41 (50) PET/gallium: 50% PET/gallium: 67% Median PFS: 56 months 5 years: 73% 
Santoro et al (2016)16  58 BeGEV 27 (46) PET: 73% PET: 83% 5 years: 59% 5 years: 78% 
StudyNInterventionRefractory, n (%)CR pre-ASCTORR pre-ASCTPFSOS
Josting et al (2010)13  (RCT) 279 DHAP 0 (0) CT: 24% CT: 71% 3 years: 69% (no significant difference between arms) 3 years: 85% (no significant difference between arms) 
Moskowitz et al (2010)14  105 ICE 48 (46) PET/gallium: 61%
CT: 33% 
CT: 59% 4 years: 56% 4 years: 72% 
Moskowitz et al (2012)11  97 ICE + GVD (PET-adapted sequential) 41 (42) PET: 60% after ICE
78% after GVD 
— 51 months: 70% 51 months: 80% 
Labrador et al (2014)15  (retrospective) 82 ESHAP 41 (50) PET/gallium: 50% PET/gallium: 67% Median PFS: 56 months 5 years: 73% 
Santoro et al (2016)16  58 BeGEV 27 (46) PET: 73% PET: 83% 5 years: 59% 5 years: 78% 

BeGEV, bendamustine, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal