Table 2.

Efficacy end points in both arms within mITT population

Efficacy end pointBelumosudil, 200 mg daily
(n = 66)
Belumosudil, 200 mg twice daily
(n = 66)
Total (N = 132)
ORR 49 (74) 51 (77) 100 (76) 
 95% CI 62-84 65-87 68-83 
ORR for responses occurring within 6 mo of treatment 47 (71) 48 (73) 95 (72) 
 95% CI 59-82 60-83 64-80 
 CR 2 (3) 1 (2) 3 (2) 
 PR 45 (68) 47 (71) 92 (70) 
ORR for responses occurring within 12 mo of treatment 49 (74) 50 (76) 99 (75) 
 95% CI 62-84 64-86 67-82 
 CR 4 (6) 2 (3) 6 (5) 
 PR 45 (68) 48 (73) 93 (71) 
Clinically significant improvement from baseline (LSS)*    
 Overall 39 (59) 41 (62) 80 (61) 
 Responder, n/N (%) 34/49 (69) 36/51 (71) 70/100 (70) 
 Nonresponder, n/N (%) 5/17 (29) 5/15 (33) 10/32 (31) 
FFS at 6 mo (95% CI), % 73 (61-83) 76 (63-84) 75 (66-81) 
FFS at 12 mo (95% CI), % 57 (44-68) 56 (43-67) 56 (47-64) 
Proportion with CS reduction 42 (64) 44 (67) 86 (65) 
Median CS reduction from baseline to greatest reduction, % 38 50 50 
Mean change in CS dose from baseline, %    
 Overall −43 −48 −45 
 Responder −49 −58 −54 
 Nonresponder −22 −10 −16 
CS discontinuation 13 (20) 15 (23) 28 (21) 
Efficacy end pointBelumosudil, 200 mg daily
(n = 66)
Belumosudil, 200 mg twice daily
(n = 66)
Total (N = 132)
ORR 49 (74) 51 (77) 100 (76) 
 95% CI 62-84 65-87 68-83 
ORR for responses occurring within 6 mo of treatment 47 (71) 48 (73) 95 (72) 
 95% CI 59-82 60-83 64-80 
 CR 2 (3) 1 (2) 3 (2) 
 PR 45 (68) 47 (71) 92 (70) 
ORR for responses occurring within 12 mo of treatment 49 (74) 50 (76) 99 (75) 
 95% CI 62-84 64-86 67-82 
 CR 4 (6) 2 (3) 6 (5) 
 PR 45 (68) 48 (73) 93 (71) 
Clinically significant improvement from baseline (LSS)*    
 Overall 39 (59) 41 (62) 80 (61) 
 Responder, n/N (%) 34/49 (69) 36/51 (71) 70/100 (70) 
 Nonresponder, n/N (%) 5/17 (29) 5/15 (33) 10/32 (31) 
FFS at 6 mo (95% CI), % 73 (61-83) 76 (63-84) 75 (66-81) 
FFS at 12 mo (95% CI), % 57 (44-68) 56 (43-67) 56 (47-64) 
Proportion with CS reduction 42 (64) 44 (67) 86 (65) 
Median CS reduction from baseline to greatest reduction, % 38 50 50 
Mean change in CS dose from baseline, %    
 Overall −43 −48 −45 
 Responder −49 −58 −54 
 Nonresponder −22 −10 −16 
CS discontinuation 13 (20) 15 (23) 28 (21) 

Unless otherwise noted, data are n (%).

*

Changes in cGVHD symptom burden were measured using LSS. Clinically meaningful improvement in symptom burden was defined as a decrease ≥ 7 points in LSS score.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal