Table 1.

Patient, disease and transplant characteristics

VariableMedian (range) or N (%)
Patient sex  
 Female 12 (39) 
 Male 19 (61) 
Patient’s age at transplant (y) 37 (21-58) 
Donor’s age at transplant (y), n = 30 29 (12-68) 
Sex of donor/recipient  
 Female/male 7 (23) 
 Other 24 (77) 
Number of mismatches 5 (2-6) 
Disease diagnosis  
 AML 17 (55) 
 ALL 13 (42) 
 MDS 1 (3) 
Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis  
 AML*  
 Intermediate 8 (26) 
 Advance 9 (29) 
 ALL  
 Favorable 3 (10) 
 Unfavorable 10 (32) 
 MDS  
 High risk 1 (3) 
Disease status before conditioning  
 AML/ALL  
 CR1 with poor risk cytogenetics 14 (45) 
 CR2/CR3 9 (29.5) 
 Active disease 7 (22.5) 
 MDS  
 High risk relapsed 1 (3) 
Time from diagnosis to transplant (mo) 7.1 (2.7-62.7) 
Donor CMV status  
 Negative 11 (35) 
 Positive 20 (65) 
Patient CMV status  
 Negative 4 (13) 
 Positive 27 (87) 
HCT comorbidity index 1 (0-6) 
 0 14 (45) 
 1-2 9 (29) 
 ≥3 8 (26) 
Disease risk iIndex  
 Low 1 (3) 
 Intermediate 11 (35) 
 High 12 (39) 
 Very high 7 (23) 
Karnofsky performance status at HCT  
 ≥80 31 (100) 
VariableMedian (range) or N (%)
Patient sex  
 Female 12 (39) 
 Male 19 (61) 
Patient’s age at transplant (y) 37 (21-58) 
Donor’s age at transplant (y), n = 30 29 (12-68) 
Sex of donor/recipient  
 Female/male 7 (23) 
 Other 24 (77) 
Number of mismatches 5 (2-6) 
Disease diagnosis  
 AML 17 (55) 
 ALL 13 (42) 
 MDS 1 (3) 
Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis  
 AML*  
 Intermediate 8 (26) 
 Advance 9 (29) 
 ALL  
 Favorable 3 (10) 
 Unfavorable 10 (32) 
 MDS  
 High risk 1 (3) 
Disease status before conditioning  
 AML/ALL  
 CR1 with poor risk cytogenetics 14 (45) 
 CR2/CR3 9 (29.5) 
 Active disease 7 (22.5) 
 MDS  
 High risk relapsed 1 (3) 
Time from diagnosis to transplant (mo) 7.1 (2.7-62.7) 
Donor CMV status  
 Negative 11 (35) 
 Positive 20 (65) 
Patient CMV status  
 Negative 4 (13) 
 Positive 27 (87) 
HCT comorbidity index 1 (0-6) 
 0 14 (45) 
 1-2 9 (29) 
 ≥3 8 (26) 
Disease risk iIndex  
 Low 1 (3) 
 Intermediate 11 (35) 
 High 12 (39) 
 Very high 7 (23) 
Karnofsky performance status at HCT  
 ≥80 31 (100) 
*

AML cytogenetic risk classification was done per ELN recommendations.16 

ALL cytogenetic risk classification was done per Moorman et al.17 

MDS cytogenetic risk classification was done per Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), Della Porta et al.18 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal