Table 3.

Multivariate analysis by Cox regression

Multivariate PFS
HRP95% CI
Bridging nonresponder (vs bridging responder) 2.273 <.001 1.484-3.481 
No bridging (vs bridging responder) 1.563 .0871 0.937-2.607 
LDH at LD (>N vs N) 1.443 .011 1.087-1.916 
ECOG (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) 1.180 .055 0.997-1.398 
Tisa-cel (vs axi-cel) 1.475 .005 1.122-1.942 
Age (decades) 0.904 .024 0.825-0.990 
Multivariate PFS
HRP95% CI
Bridging nonresponder (vs bridging responder) 2.273 <.001 1.484-3.481 
No bridging (vs bridging responder) 1.563 .0871 0.937-2.607 
LDH at LD (>N vs N) 1.443 .011 1.087-1.916 
ECOG (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) 1.180 .055 0.997-1.398 
Tisa-cel (vs axi-cel) 1.475 .005 1.122-1.942 
Age (decades) 0.904 .024 0.825-0.990 
Multivariate OS
HR*P95% CI
Bridging nonresponder (vs bridging responder) 2.273 .003 1.324-3.901 
No bridging (vs bridging responder) 1.032 .925 0.531-2.008 
LDH at LD (>N vs N) 1.439 .038 1.021-2.028 
ECOG (0, 1, 2, 3, 4)* 1.357 .003 1.107-1.663 
Multivariate OS
HR*P95% CI
Bridging nonresponder (vs bridging responder) 2.273 .003 1.324-3.901 
No bridging (vs bridging responder) 1.032 .925 0.531-2.008 
LDH at LD (>N vs N) 1.439 .038 1.021-2.028 
ECOG (0, 1, 2, 3, 4)* 1.357 .003 1.107-1.663 

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; LD, lymphodepletion; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; N, normal.

*

HR refers to change of 1 point in score.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal