Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of effects of select prognostic variables and randomized treatment on overall survival and relapse-free survival on study

SurvivalHR95% CIP value
Overall    
Randomized treatment: Oral-AZA vs placebo 0.732 0.5898-0.9074 .004 
NPM1 mutation status at diagnosis: NPM1mut vs NPM1wt 0.624 0.469-0.829 .001 
FLT3 mutation status at diagnosis: FLT3mut (ITD/TKD) vs FLT3wt 1.444 1.023-2.039 .036 
Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis: poor vs intermediate 1.853 1.376-2.495 <.001 
MRD status at screening: MRD+ vs MRD 1.716 1.380-2.133 <.001 
Relapse-free    
Randomized treatment: Oral-AZA vs placebo 0.631 0.509-0.782 <.001 
NPM1 mutation status at diagnosis: NPM1mut vs NPM1wt 0.614 0.467-0.808 <.001 
FLT3 mutation status at diagnosis: FLT3mut (ITD/TKD) vs FLT3wt 1.034 0.727-1.472 .851 
Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis: poor vs intermediate 1.753 1.294-2.375 <.001 
MRD status at screening: MRD+ vs MRD 1.984 1.596-2.466 <.001 
SurvivalHR95% CIP value
Overall    
Randomized treatment: Oral-AZA vs placebo 0.732 0.5898-0.9074 .004 
NPM1 mutation status at diagnosis: NPM1mut vs NPM1wt 0.624 0.469-0.829 .001 
FLT3 mutation status at diagnosis: FLT3mut (ITD/TKD) vs FLT3wt 1.444 1.023-2.039 .036 
Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis: poor vs intermediate 1.853 1.376-2.495 <.001 
MRD status at screening: MRD+ vs MRD 1.716 1.380-2.133 <.001 
Relapse-free    
Randomized treatment: Oral-AZA vs placebo 0.631 0.509-0.782 <.001 
NPM1 mutation status at diagnosis: NPM1mut vs NPM1wt 0.614 0.467-0.808 <.001 
FLT3 mutation status at diagnosis: FLT3mut (ITD/TKD) vs FLT3wt 1.034 0.727-1.472 .851 
Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis: poor vs intermediate 1.753 1.294-2.375 <.001 
MRD status at screening: MRD+ vs MRD 1.984 1.596-2.466 <.001 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal