Table 1.

Overview of studies evaluating preemptive DLI

ReferenceStudy designDiseaseGraft type, conditioning regimen, donor source, GvHD prophylaxisTriggerCell doseStudy arms comparedEfficacy outcomesGrade III/IV GvHD
20  Prospective, nonrandomized AML (n = 36), ALL (n = 44) NR MRD Starting CD3 dose
Matched related:
1 × 106/kg
MUD/MMUD: 1 × 105/kg 
Preemptive DLI vs
no DLI 
CIR: 6%
3-y OS: 80%
——
CIR: 63%
3-y OS: 26% 
NR 
21  Case report AML (n = 1) NR MRD, MC Not reported Single case report Conversion to MRD negativity NR 
22  Prospective, nonrandomized AML (n = 61)
ALL (n = 38)
MDS (n = 6)
Total n = 105 
T cell-replete MAC-BM/PBSC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 40): Bu/Cy or Cy/TBI
Haplo (n = 53) and MUD (n = 12):
Bu/Cy + ATG or Cy/TBI + ATG
GvHD prophylaxis: CSA, MMF, MTX (± ATG) 
MRD Median CD3 dose: 3.8 × 107/kg Preemptive DLI (n = 56) vs
IL-2 (n = 49) 
CIR: 28%
3-y OS: 58%
3-y DFS: 56%
——
CIR: 64%
3-y OS: 28%
3-y DFS: 24% 
8% (P = .471)
——
4% 
30  Retrospective AML (n = 14)
ALL (n = 11)
CML (n = 2) 
T cell-replete MAC-PBSC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 14): Bu/Cy
Haplo (n = 2) and MUD (n = 11):
Bu/Cy + ATG + cytarabine
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MMF, MTX (± ATG) 
MRD Median CD3 dose: 5.51 × 107/kg Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
1-y OS: 94%
——
1-y OS: 27% 
6%
——
9% 
24  Prospective, nonrandomized phase 2 trial AML (n = 14)
MDS (n = 4)
MPN (n = 2)
Others
(n = 16) 
T cell-replete low-dose alemtuzumab RIC-PBSC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
Myeloid: Flu/Bu
Lymphoid: Flu/Cy (± rituximab)
Donor source:
MUD: 33
MMUD: 3
GvHD prophylaxis:
Tacrolimus, MTX, alemtuzumab 
MC (<50% at d+60) Starting CD3 dose: 0.5–1.0 × 107/kg Preemptive DLI 2-y OS: 57%;
2-y DFS: 38%;
1-y NRM: 14% 
0% 
25  Retrospective AML (n = 16)
NHL (n = 6)
HL (n = 5)
MM (n = 4)
ALL (n = 3)
Others (n = 6) 
T cell-replete HLA-haplo-BM-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 6): Bu/Cy
RIC (n = 34): Flu/Cy/TBI
Donor source:
Haplo (n = 40)
GvHD prophylaxis:
Tacrolimus, MMF, PTCy 
MRD, LOC Starting CD3 dose 1 × 105/kg-1 × 106/kg Preemptive DLI (n = 5) vs
Therapeutic DLI (n = 35) 
ORR: 60%
——
ORR: 26% 
NR 
23  Prospective, nonrandomized AML (n = 17) T cell-replete BM/PBSC-MAC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 43): Bu/Cy or Cy/TBI
Haplo (n = 44) and MUD (n = 5):
Bu/Cy + ATG or Cy/TBI + ATG
GvHD prophylaxis: CSA, MMF, MTX (± ATG) 
MRD NR Preemptive DLI vs
No DLI 
2-y CIR: 24%
2-y OS: 64%
——
2-y CIR: 84%
2-y OS: 0% 
NR 
26  Retrospective AML (n = 22)
ALL (n = 9)
MM (n = 1) 
T cell-replete HLA-haplo-MAC-BM-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
Flu/Bu/TT
Flu/TBI
Donor source: Haplo (n = 32)
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MMF, PTCy 
MRD Starting CD3 dose 1 × 104/kg-1 × 105/kg Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
ORR: 45%
2-y OS: 43%
——
ORR: 33%
2-y OS: 19% 
5%
——
8% 
35  Retrospective AML (n = 207) T cell-replete MAC-BM/PBSC/CB-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
Bu/Flu (+TT), Bu/Cy, Cy/Mel/TT
Cy/TT, Cy/TBI
Donor source:
Matched related (n = 82)
MUD (n = 66)
Haplo (n = 59)
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MTX 
MRD Starting CD3 dose:
Matched-sibling: 1 × 106/kg
MUD: 1 × 105/kg;
HaploDLI: 1 × 104/kg 
WT1 100 copies/104 ABL vs
WT1 180 copies/104 ABL 
CIR: 29%
4-y LFS 74%
——
CIR: 76%
4-y LFS: 23% 
0%
0% 
31  Retrospective AML (n = 31)
NHL (n = 19)
MDS (n = 8)
Others (n = 28) 
T cell-replete BM/PBSC-MAC/RIC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
RIC (n = 60): Flu, Mel, Alemtuzumab
MAC (n = 26):
Bu/Cy, Bu/Flu, TBI/Cy, TBI/Cy/VP
Donor sources:
Matched related (n = 53)
MUD (n = 25)
MMUD (n = 8)
GvHD prophylaxis:
Not reported for MAC; alemtuzumab for RIC 
MC Starting CD3 dose:
Matched-sibling: 3 × 106-1 × 107/kg
MUD: 1-3 × 106/kg 
Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
5-y OS: 69%
5-y PFS: 71%
——
5-y OS: 28%
5-y PFS: 18% 
26%
——
31% 
28  Retrospective AML (n = 14)
MDS (n = 20
ALL/NHL (n = 5)
CML (n = 2) 
T-cell replete PB-haploHCT
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 8)
RIC (n = 13)
Donor source:
Haplo (n = 21)
GvHD prophylaxis: tacrolimus, MMF/ sirolimus, MMF, PTCy 
MC Most common starting CD3 dose:
1 × 106/kg 
Preemptive DLI (n = 2) vs
Therapeutic DLI (n = 12) 
120-d OS: 100%
——
120-d OS: 29% 
NR 
27  Retrospective, matched-pair analysis AML, MDS,
ALL (n = 20) 
T cell-replete BM/PBSC-MAC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 8): Bu/Cy
Haplo (n = 12): Bu/Cy + cytarabine + ATG
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MMF, MTX 
MRD Median CD3 dose: 2.5 × 107/kg No control MRD conversion: 75%;
2-y CIR 31%;
2-y OS 69% 
Grade II-IV aGvHD: 4 (20%) 
29  Retrospective single-center landmark analysis AML (n = 42) T cell-replete PBSC-MAC/RIC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 12): Bu/Cy, TT/Bu/Flu
RIC (n = 30): Flu/BCNU/Mel, Flu/TT
Donor source: matched related (n = 11)
MUD (n = 23)
MMUD (n = 7)
Haplo (n = 1)
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA/Alemtuzumab, CSA/MMF, MTX ± ATG 
MRD (n = 18)
MC (n = 24) 
Median starting CD3 dose:
0.69 × 106/kg 
Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
5-y OS: 43%
——
5-y OS: 10% 
7%
——
6% 
34  Retrospective registry study AML (n = 153)
ALL (n = 39) 
BM/PBSC-MAC /RIC-alloHSCT with (n = 149) and without (n = 42)
T-cell depletion
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 74)
RIC (n = 107)
Donor source:
Matched related (n = 129)
MUD (n = 63)
GvHD prophylaxis:
No IST regimens reported 
MRD (n = 23)
MC (n = 169) 
Median starting CD3 dose: 1 × 106/kg Preemptive DLI for MRD (n = 23)
Preemptive DLI for MC (n = 169) 
Decreasing MRD/improving peripheral blood counts: 71% (16/21);
5-y NRM: 9%
5-y CIR: 44%
5-y LFS: 47%
5-y OS: 51%
——
Improving MC: 70% (110/158);
5-y NRM: 15%
5-y CIR: 28%
5-y LFS: 57%
5-y OS: 63% 
7% (18/248 patients from entire cohort including preemptive DLI for MRD/MC and prophylactic DLI) 
ReferenceStudy designDiseaseGraft type, conditioning regimen, donor source, GvHD prophylaxisTriggerCell doseStudy arms comparedEfficacy outcomesGrade III/IV GvHD
20  Prospective, nonrandomized AML (n = 36), ALL (n = 44) NR MRD Starting CD3 dose
Matched related:
1 × 106/kg
MUD/MMUD: 1 × 105/kg 
Preemptive DLI vs
no DLI 
CIR: 6%
3-y OS: 80%
——
CIR: 63%
3-y OS: 26% 
NR 
21  Case report AML (n = 1) NR MRD, MC Not reported Single case report Conversion to MRD negativity NR 
22  Prospective, nonrandomized AML (n = 61)
ALL (n = 38)
MDS (n = 6)
Total n = 105 
T cell-replete MAC-BM/PBSC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 40): Bu/Cy or Cy/TBI
Haplo (n = 53) and MUD (n = 12):
Bu/Cy + ATG or Cy/TBI + ATG
GvHD prophylaxis: CSA, MMF, MTX (± ATG) 
MRD Median CD3 dose: 3.8 × 107/kg Preemptive DLI (n = 56) vs
IL-2 (n = 49) 
CIR: 28%
3-y OS: 58%
3-y DFS: 56%
——
CIR: 64%
3-y OS: 28%
3-y DFS: 24% 
8% (P = .471)
——
4% 
30  Retrospective AML (n = 14)
ALL (n = 11)
CML (n = 2) 
T cell-replete MAC-PBSC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 14): Bu/Cy
Haplo (n = 2) and MUD (n = 11):
Bu/Cy + ATG + cytarabine
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MMF, MTX (± ATG) 
MRD Median CD3 dose: 5.51 × 107/kg Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
1-y OS: 94%
——
1-y OS: 27% 
6%
——
9% 
24  Prospective, nonrandomized phase 2 trial AML (n = 14)
MDS (n = 4)
MPN (n = 2)
Others
(n = 16) 
T cell-replete low-dose alemtuzumab RIC-PBSC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
Myeloid: Flu/Bu
Lymphoid: Flu/Cy (± rituximab)
Donor source:
MUD: 33
MMUD: 3
GvHD prophylaxis:
Tacrolimus, MTX, alemtuzumab 
MC (<50% at d+60) Starting CD3 dose: 0.5–1.0 × 107/kg Preemptive DLI 2-y OS: 57%;
2-y DFS: 38%;
1-y NRM: 14% 
0% 
25  Retrospective AML (n = 16)
NHL (n = 6)
HL (n = 5)
MM (n = 4)
ALL (n = 3)
Others (n = 6) 
T cell-replete HLA-haplo-BM-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 6): Bu/Cy
RIC (n = 34): Flu/Cy/TBI
Donor source:
Haplo (n = 40)
GvHD prophylaxis:
Tacrolimus, MMF, PTCy 
MRD, LOC Starting CD3 dose 1 × 105/kg-1 × 106/kg Preemptive DLI (n = 5) vs
Therapeutic DLI (n = 35) 
ORR: 60%
——
ORR: 26% 
NR 
23  Prospective, nonrandomized AML (n = 17) T cell-replete BM/PBSC-MAC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 43): Bu/Cy or Cy/TBI
Haplo (n = 44) and MUD (n = 5):
Bu/Cy + ATG or Cy/TBI + ATG
GvHD prophylaxis: CSA, MMF, MTX (± ATG) 
MRD NR Preemptive DLI vs
No DLI 
2-y CIR: 24%
2-y OS: 64%
——
2-y CIR: 84%
2-y OS: 0% 
NR 
26  Retrospective AML (n = 22)
ALL (n = 9)
MM (n = 1) 
T cell-replete HLA-haplo-MAC-BM-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
Flu/Bu/TT
Flu/TBI
Donor source: Haplo (n = 32)
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MMF, PTCy 
MRD Starting CD3 dose 1 × 104/kg-1 × 105/kg Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
ORR: 45%
2-y OS: 43%
——
ORR: 33%
2-y OS: 19% 
5%
——
8% 
35  Retrospective AML (n = 207) T cell-replete MAC-BM/PBSC/CB-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
Bu/Flu (+TT), Bu/Cy, Cy/Mel/TT
Cy/TT, Cy/TBI
Donor source:
Matched related (n = 82)
MUD (n = 66)
Haplo (n = 59)
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MTX 
MRD Starting CD3 dose:
Matched-sibling: 1 × 106/kg
MUD: 1 × 105/kg;
HaploDLI: 1 × 104/kg 
WT1 100 copies/104 ABL vs
WT1 180 copies/104 ABL 
CIR: 29%
4-y LFS 74%
——
CIR: 76%
4-y LFS: 23% 
0%
0% 
31  Retrospective AML (n = 31)
NHL (n = 19)
MDS (n = 8)
Others (n = 28) 
T cell-replete BM/PBSC-MAC/RIC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
RIC (n = 60): Flu, Mel, Alemtuzumab
MAC (n = 26):
Bu/Cy, Bu/Flu, TBI/Cy, TBI/Cy/VP
Donor sources:
Matched related (n = 53)
MUD (n = 25)
MMUD (n = 8)
GvHD prophylaxis:
Not reported for MAC; alemtuzumab for RIC 
MC Starting CD3 dose:
Matched-sibling: 3 × 106-1 × 107/kg
MUD: 1-3 × 106/kg 
Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
5-y OS: 69%
5-y PFS: 71%
——
5-y OS: 28%
5-y PFS: 18% 
26%
——
31% 
28  Retrospective AML (n = 14)
MDS (n = 20
ALL/NHL (n = 5)
CML (n = 2) 
T-cell replete PB-haploHCT
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 8)
RIC (n = 13)
Donor source:
Haplo (n = 21)
GvHD prophylaxis: tacrolimus, MMF/ sirolimus, MMF, PTCy 
MC Most common starting CD3 dose:
1 × 106/kg 
Preemptive DLI (n = 2) vs
Therapeutic DLI (n = 12) 
120-d OS: 100%
——
120-d OS: 29% 
NR 
27  Retrospective, matched-pair analysis AML, MDS,
ALL (n = 20) 
T cell-replete BM/PBSC-MAC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens/donor source: matched related (n = 8): Bu/Cy
Haplo (n = 12): Bu/Cy + cytarabine + ATG
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA, MMF, MTX 
MRD Median CD3 dose: 2.5 × 107/kg No control MRD conversion: 75%;
2-y CIR 31%;
2-y OS 69% 
Grade II-IV aGvHD: 4 (20%) 
29  Retrospective single-center landmark analysis AML (n = 42) T cell-replete PBSC-MAC/RIC-alloHSCT
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 12): Bu/Cy, TT/Bu/Flu
RIC (n = 30): Flu/BCNU/Mel, Flu/TT
Donor source: matched related (n = 11)
MUD (n = 23)
MMUD (n = 7)
Haplo (n = 1)
GvHD prophylaxis:
CSA/Alemtuzumab, CSA/MMF, MTX ± ATG 
MRD (n = 18)
MC (n = 24) 
Median starting CD3 dose:
0.69 × 106/kg 
Preemptive DLI vs
Therapeutic DLI 
5-y OS: 43%
——
5-y OS: 10% 
7%
——
6% 
34  Retrospective registry study AML (n = 153)
ALL (n = 39) 
BM/PBSC-MAC /RIC-alloHSCT with (n = 149) and without (n = 42)
T-cell depletion
Conditioning regimens:
MAC (n = 74)
RIC (n = 107)
Donor source:
Matched related (n = 129)
MUD (n = 63)
GvHD prophylaxis:
No IST regimens reported 
MRD (n = 23)
MC (n = 169) 
Median starting CD3 dose: 1 × 106/kg Preemptive DLI for MRD (n = 23)
Preemptive DLI for MC (n = 169) 
Decreasing MRD/improving peripheral blood counts: 71% (16/21);
5-y NRM: 9%
5-y CIR: 44%
5-y LFS: 47%
5-y OS: 51%
——
Improving MC: 70% (110/158);
5-y NRM: 15%
5-y CIR: 28%
5-y LFS: 57%
5-y OS: 63% 
7% (18/248 patients from entire cohort including preemptive DLI for MRD/MC and prophylactic DLI) 

aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; BCNU, carmustine; Bu, busulfan; CIR, cumulative incidence of relapse; CSA, cyclosporine A; Cy, cyclophosphamide; DFS, disease-free survival; DLI, donor lymphocyte infusion; Flu, fludarabine; Haplo, HLA-haploidentical donor; LFS, leukemia-free survival; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; MC, mixed chimerism; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; Mel, melphalan; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MRD, measurable residual disease; MTX, methotrexate; MUD, matched unrelated donor; NR, not reported; NRM, nonrelapse mortality; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PTCy, posttransplant cyclophosphamide; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning; TBI, total body irradiation; TT, thiotepa; VP, etoposide.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal