Table 2.

Overview of outcomes of patients with BDPCN from different therapy approaches with a focus on post-HSCT outcomes

Author and study periodType of studyTherapy details Response rates [(N)/%] OS dynamicsSCT-specific outcomes
Roos-Weil et al33 (EBMT analysis; 2000-2009) Retrospective (only patients receiving transplant included) Nontargeted
AML/ALL-type = 27
NHL-type = 7 
N/A  Allo-SCT in CR1 = 19
Allo-SCT ≥ CR1 = 15
3 y OS = 43% 
Laribi et al121 
2001-2017 
Retrospective Nontargeted
AML-type = 53
ALL-type = 96
NHL-type = 150 
AML-type Rx f/b SCT = 14/16 (88%)
ALL-type Rx f/b SCT = 31/33 (94%)
NHL-type Rx f/b SCT = 12/12 (100%) 
Median OS = 18 mo 5 years OS
AML-type therapy f/b allo-SCT = 59.5%
ALL-type therapy f/b allo-SCT = 47.3%
NHL-type therapy f/b allo-SCT = 71.1%
No allo-SCT = 9.6% for leukemia-type therapy, 8.3% for lymphoma-type therapy 
Yun et al72 
2001-2019 
Retrospective Mixed
AML-like = 1
ALL-type = 11
NHL-like = 10
SL-401 = 12 
N/A
11 (100)
9 (90)
9 (75) 
 mOS with SCT = NR
mOS without SCT ≈ 3 y 
Pagano et al10 
2005-2011 
Retrospective Nontargeted
AML-type = 26
ALL-type = 15 
7/16 (44)
10/15 (67) 
Median OS = 8.7 mo
After AML-type Rx = 7.1 mo
After ALL-type Rx = 12.3 mo 
SCT = 6
mOS with SCT = 22.7 mo
mOS without SCT= 7.1 mo 
Aoki et al31 (JSHCT analysis; 2002-2015) Retrospective (only patients receiving transplant included) Nontargeted
AML-type =4
ALL-type = 10
NHL-type = 11 
N/A 4 y OS = 65%
After AML-type Rx = 67%
After ALL-type Rx = 70%
After NHL-type Rx = 62% 
4 y OS
After auto-SCT = 82%
After allo-SCT = 69% 
Taylor et al24 
2000-2017 
Retrospective Nontargeted
AML-type = 9
ALL-type = 35
Others = 10 
N/A 2 y OS = 49% SCT = 25; (allo = 20, auto = 5)
2 y OS after SCT = 60% 
Pemmaraju et al30 
1999-2020 
Retrospective Mixed
ALL-type = 35
SL-401 = 37
Others = 28 
80%
59%
43% 
Median OS
After ALL-type Rx= 28.3 mo
After SL-401 = 13.7 mo
After other Rx = 22.8 mo 
% responders proceeding to allo-SCT in CR1
15/28 (54%)
13/22 (59%)
4/12 (33%)
SCT specific survival data N/A 
Pemmaraju et al71 
2014-2019 
Prospective clinical trial
(long-term follow-up, 34 mo) 
Targeted
SL-401 (F/L) = 65§  
75% 2 y OS = 40% SCT = 19 
2 y OS after SCT = 66%
2 y OS without SCT ≈ 30% 
Author and study periodType of studyTherapy details Response rates [(N)/%] OS dynamicsSCT-specific outcomes
Roos-Weil et al33 (EBMT analysis; 2000-2009) Retrospective (only patients receiving transplant included) Nontargeted
AML/ALL-type = 27
NHL-type = 7 
N/A  Allo-SCT in CR1 = 19
Allo-SCT ≥ CR1 = 15
3 y OS = 43% 
Laribi et al121 
2001-2017 
Retrospective Nontargeted
AML-type = 53
ALL-type = 96
NHL-type = 150 
AML-type Rx f/b SCT = 14/16 (88%)
ALL-type Rx f/b SCT = 31/33 (94%)
NHL-type Rx f/b SCT = 12/12 (100%) 
Median OS = 18 mo 5 years OS
AML-type therapy f/b allo-SCT = 59.5%
ALL-type therapy f/b allo-SCT = 47.3%
NHL-type therapy f/b allo-SCT = 71.1%
No allo-SCT = 9.6% for leukemia-type therapy, 8.3% for lymphoma-type therapy 
Yun et al72 
2001-2019 
Retrospective Mixed
AML-like = 1
ALL-type = 11
NHL-like = 10
SL-401 = 12 
N/A
11 (100)
9 (90)
9 (75) 
 mOS with SCT = NR
mOS without SCT ≈ 3 y 
Pagano et al10 
2005-2011 
Retrospective Nontargeted
AML-type = 26
ALL-type = 15 
7/16 (44)
10/15 (67) 
Median OS = 8.7 mo
After AML-type Rx = 7.1 mo
After ALL-type Rx = 12.3 mo 
SCT = 6
mOS with SCT = 22.7 mo
mOS without SCT= 7.1 mo 
Aoki et al31 (JSHCT analysis; 2002-2015) Retrospective (only patients receiving transplant included) Nontargeted
AML-type =4
ALL-type = 10
NHL-type = 11 
N/A 4 y OS = 65%
After AML-type Rx = 67%
After ALL-type Rx = 70%
After NHL-type Rx = 62% 
4 y OS
After auto-SCT = 82%
After allo-SCT = 69% 
Taylor et al24 
2000-2017 
Retrospective Nontargeted
AML-type = 9
ALL-type = 35
Others = 10 
N/A 2 y OS = 49% SCT = 25; (allo = 20, auto = 5)
2 y OS after SCT = 60% 
Pemmaraju et al30 
1999-2020 
Retrospective Mixed
ALL-type = 35
SL-401 = 37
Others = 28 
80%
59%
43% 
Median OS
After ALL-type Rx= 28.3 mo
After SL-401 = 13.7 mo
After other Rx = 22.8 mo 
% responders proceeding to allo-SCT in CR1
15/28 (54%)
13/22 (59%)
4/12 (33%)
SCT specific survival data N/A 
Pemmaraju et al71 
2014-2019 
Prospective clinical trial
(long-term follow-up, 34 mo) 
Targeted
SL-401 (F/L) = 65§  
75% 2 y OS = 40% SCT = 19 
2 y OS after SCT = 66%
2 y OS without SCT ≈ 30% 

The boldface text denotes the type of regimen used in the study mentioned in each particular row.

auto-SCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; EBMT, European society for blood and marrow transplantation; f/b, followed by; mOS, median overall survival; N/A, not available; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NR, not reached; Rx, therapy; SL-401, tagraxofusp.

Therapy details have been broadly divided as targeted or nontargeted based on treatment with SL-401, which is targeted against CD 123.

Response rates include complete and partial remissions and annotated the best possible extent from available study data.

Includes the 19 patients who underwent SCT after CR + CRc; overall 21 patients underwent SCT.

§

Patients who received the 12 μg/kg dose of SL-401.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal