Table 3.

Multivariate analysis on transplant outcomes stratified by the RICE score

Low RICE score (0-1)High RICE score (2-3)
HR (95% CI)P valuesHR (95% CI)P values
Training cohort     
NRM     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.99 (0.85-1.15) .860 0.73 (0.60-0.90) .003 
Relapse     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 1.05 (0.88-1.25) .570 1.04 (0.82-1.33) .740 
OS     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.96 (0.85-1.08) .457 0.76 (0.65-0.90) .001 
Validation cohort     
NRM     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.81 (0.66-1.01) .061 0.57 (0.43-0.77) <.001 
Relapse     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 1.24 (0.97-1.58) .088 1.47 (1.02-2.12) .037 
OS     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.93 (0.79-1.11) .422 0.79 (0.63-0.99) .048 
Low RICE score (0-1)High RICE score (2-3)
HR (95% CI)P valuesHR (95% CI)P values
Training cohort     
NRM     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.99 (0.85-1.15) .860 0.73 (0.60-0.90) .003 
Relapse     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 1.05 (0.88-1.25) .570 1.04 (0.82-1.33) .740 
OS     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.96 (0.85-1.08) .457 0.76 (0.65-0.90) .001 
Validation cohort     
NRM     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.81 (0.66-1.01) .061 0.57 (0.43-0.77) <.001 
Relapse     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 1.24 (0.97-1.58) .088 1.47 (1.02-2.12) .037 
OS     
Myeloablative Ref Ref 
Reduced intensity 0.93 (0.79-1.11) .422 0.79 (0.63-0.99) .048 

All models were adjusted for recipient’s age, sex mismatch disease, DRI, KPS, HCT-CI, donor source, GVHD prophylaxis, in vivo T-cell depletion, and the year of receiving HCT.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal