Table 4.

Risk factors of NRM at lymphodepletion by multivariate analysis

ParameterOdds ratio estimateLower 95% CI limit for odds ratioUpper 95% CI limit for odds ratio
Age, y, ≥65, yes vs no 1.033 0.992 1.075 
Diabetes, yes vs no 4.417 1.651 11.819 
ECOG PS of ≥2 at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 2.354 0.607 9.126 
Platelets < 50 G/L at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 1.133 0.446 2.878 
Elevated ferritin level at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 2.716 1.003 7.350 
C-reactive protein level > 30 mg/L at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 1.246 0.399 3.892 
ParameterOdds ratio estimateLower 95% CI limit for odds ratioUpper 95% CI limit for odds ratio
Age, y, ≥65, yes vs no 1.033 0.992 1.075 
Diabetes, yes vs no 4.417 1.651 11.819 
ECOG PS of ≥2 at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 2.354 0.607 9.126 
Platelets < 50 G/L at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 1.133 0.446 2.878 
Elevated ferritin level at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 2.716 1.003 7.350 
C-reactive protein level > 30 mg/L at lymphodepletion, yes vs no 1.246 0.399 3.892 

Logistic regression for the prediction of NRM comparing the overall NRM population with patients alive without progression at 1 year after CAR T-cell infusion.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal