Table 2.

Mixed model analysis comparing log10-transformed serum TARC levels between HL cases and their respective controls

VariableNo. in analysisEffect sizeSEP valueTime to diagnosis, y
All patients 103 1.27 0.073 1.2 × 10-47 6.35 
Subtype      
Nodular sclerosis 67 1.37 0.084 3.5 × 10-43 6.23 
Mixed cellularity 13 0.92 0.19 1.6 × 10-6 4.0 
Classic NOS 23 1.25 0.13 1.3 × 10-18 8.33 
EBV status       
Negative 76 1.35 0.079 1.6 × 10-46 6.14 
Positive 23 0.88 0.13 7.9 × 10-11 8.0 
VariableNo. in analysisEffect sizeSEP valueTime to diagnosis, y
All patients 103 1.27 0.073 1.2 × 10-47 6.35 
Subtype      
Nodular sclerosis 67 1.37 0.084 3.5 × 10-43 6.23 
Mixed cellularity 13 0.92 0.19 1.6 × 10-6 4.0 
Classic NOS 23 1.25 0.13 1.3 × 10-18 8.33 
EBV status       
Negative 76 1.35 0.079 1.6 × 10-46 6.14 
Positive 23 0.88 0.13 7.9 × 10-11 8.0 

Case-control pair identifier and individual identifier within a pair were accounted for as random effects. Effect size and SE show the difference between cases and respective controls in log10-transformed TARC levels at the time of diagnosis. Time to diagnosis indicates the calculated time point at which TARC levels start to increase in cases.

NOS, not otherwise specified.

For 4 cases, EBV status was not available.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal