Table 5.

In silico prediction of novel variants in the CFD cohort

Novel variantsProteinGeneExon/IntronClassificationFg:C/Fg:Ag (mg/dL)Bleeding severityIn silico prediction
ScoresVarsome
c.1036G>C p.Asp346His FGG Ex 8 Hypodysfibrinogenemia 45/117 Grade 1 CADD:28, SIFT:0, PolyPhen:1 Likely pathogenic 
c.425C>A p.Ser142Ter FGG Ex 5 Hypofibrinogenemia 105/109 Asymptomatic CADD:36 Likely pathogenic 
c.115-610G>C FGB Int 1 Afibrinogenemia Undetectable Grade 3 varSEAK:1, CADD:6.9 Not classified 
Novel variantsProteinGeneExon/IntronClassificationFg:C/Fg:Ag (mg/dL)Bleeding severityIn silico prediction
ScoresVarsome
c.1036G>C p.Asp346His FGG Ex 8 Hypodysfibrinogenemia 45/117 Grade 1 CADD:28, SIFT:0, PolyPhen:1 Likely pathogenic 
c.425C>A p.Ser142Ter FGG Ex 5 Hypofibrinogenemia 105/109 Asymptomatic CADD:36 Likely pathogenic 
c.115-610G>C FGB Int 1 Afibrinogenemia Undetectable Grade 3 varSEAK:1, CADD:6.9 Not classified 

Four different in silico tools and VarSome were used to predict the effects of novel variants. These tools included Polymorphism Phenotypingv2 (PolyPhen-2), Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT), and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD). Splice variants were assessed using the varSEAK software and the CADD score. As we expected, nonsense variants were also predicted to be harmful using the CADD score.

Polyphen score: >0.908: probably damaging; >0.446 and ≤0.908: possibly damaging; ≤0.446: benign.

SIFT score: <0.05: deleterious; ≥0.05: tolerated.

CADD score: >20, deleterious

varSEAK classification: class 1, no splicing effect; class 2, likely no splicing effect; class 3, unknown splicing effect; class 4, likely splicing effect; and class 5, splicing effect.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal