Table 1.

Clinical impact of resistance mechanisms

AlterationDisease stageFrequencyDetection technique Clinical impactReference(s)
16p loss (TNFRSF17Pretreatment screening 3%-4% of TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 12,13  
TNFRSF17 mutation Pretreatment screening 1.1% (somatic) and 0.7% (germ line) of TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 13  
12p loss (GPRC5DPretreatment screening 13%-15% of TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 12-14  
GPRC5D mutation Pretreatment screening 4% TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 12  
Low GPRC5D expression Pretreatment screening TBD RNA-seq Associated with reduced talquetamab efficacy in vitro. May facilitate epigenetic inactivation of the target 14,20  
Abundance of exhausted T-cell clones Pretreatment screening TBD scRNA/VDJ-seq Predicts response failure to BCMA-targeting TCE 19  
TNFRSF17 homozygous deletion At relapse 1/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Precludes response to other BCMA-targeting therapy 12,13  
TNFRSF17 p.Arg27Pro At relapse 1/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Confers resistance to teclistamab and elranatanab 13  
TNFRSF17 p.Pro34del At relapse 3/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Confers resistance to teclistamab and elranatanab 13  
TNFRSF17 p.Ser30del At relapse 2/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Confers resistance to teclistamab 13  
Bi-allelic genetic GPRC5D inactivation At relapse 5/7 post-talquetamab relapses WGS Likely precludes response to other GPRC5D-targeting therapy 13,14  
Epigenetic GPRC5D inactivation At relapse 2/3 post-talquetamab relapses scMultiome (RNA-seq + ATAC-seq) Likely precludes response to other GPRC5D-targeting therapy 14  
AlterationDisease stageFrequencyDetection technique Clinical impactReference(s)
16p loss (TNFRSF17Pretreatment screening 3%-4% of TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 12,13  
TNFRSF17 mutation Pretreatment screening 1.1% (somatic) and 0.7% (germ line) of TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 13  
12p loss (GPRC5DPretreatment screening 13%-15% of TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 12-14  
GPRC5D mutation Pretreatment screening 4% TCE-naive MM WGS May facilitate biallelic target inactivation by second hit 12  
Low GPRC5D expression Pretreatment screening TBD RNA-seq Associated with reduced talquetamab efficacy in vitro. May facilitate epigenetic inactivation of the target 14,20  
Abundance of exhausted T-cell clones Pretreatment screening TBD scRNA/VDJ-seq Predicts response failure to BCMA-targeting TCE 19  
TNFRSF17 homozygous deletion At relapse 1/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Precludes response to other BCMA-targeting therapy 12,13  
TNFRSF17 p.Arg27Pro At relapse 1/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Confers resistance to teclistamab and elranatanab 13  
TNFRSF17 p.Pro34del At relapse 3/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Confers resistance to teclistamab and elranatanab 13  
TNFRSF17 p.Ser30del At relapse 2/14 relapses after BCMA-targeting TCE WGS Confers resistance to teclistamab 13  
Bi-allelic genetic GPRC5D inactivation At relapse 5/7 post-talquetamab relapses WGS Likely precludes response to other GPRC5D-targeting therapy 13,14  
Epigenetic GPRC5D inactivation At relapse 2/3 post-talquetamab relapses scMultiome (RNA-seq + ATAC-seq) Likely precludes response to other GPRC5D-targeting therapy 14  

The molecular alterations associated with TCE resistance and their clinical implications are summarized.

RNA-seq, RNA sequencing; TBD, to be determined; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.

Indicated techniques are those used in the original references.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal