Summary of TCD reports
| TCD reports . | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| . | Median (range) . | . | . |
| Patient age, y | 5 (2-8) | ||
| TCD year | 2013 (2000-2016) | ||
| TCD type∗ | Count (%) | ||
| TCD | 183 (47) | ||
| TCDi | 207 (53) | ||
| Vessels assessed† | Yes | No | Total |
| MCA | 377 (100%) | 0 | 377 |
| ACA | 327 (89%) | 42 (11%) | 369 |
| PCA | 306 (84%) | 60 (16%) | 366 |
| dICA | 275 (76%) | 86 (24%) | 361 |
| Basilar | 185 (51%) | 179 (49%) | 364 |
| Bifurcation | 146 (41%) | 212 (59%) | 358 |
| Vertebral | 203 (29%) | 255 (71%) | 358 |
| Numerical velocities supplied | Yes | No | Partial |
| 335 (86%) | 24 (6%) | 32 (8%) | |
| Classification based on TAMMV | Yes | No | Unknown |
| 162 (42%) | 23 (6%) | 200 (52%) | |
| Peak velocities assessed‡ | Yes | No | Unknown |
| 123 (33%) | 246 (37%) | ||
| Peak velocities noted in impression | 52 (42%) | 71 (58%) | |
| TCD reports . | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| . | Median (range) . | . | . |
| Patient age, y | 5 (2-8) | ||
| TCD year | 2013 (2000-2016) | ||
| TCD type∗ | Count (%) | ||
| TCD | 183 (47) | ||
| TCDi | 207 (53) | ||
| Vessels assessed† | Yes | No | Total |
| MCA | 377 (100%) | 0 | 377 |
| ACA | 327 (89%) | 42 (11%) | 369 |
| PCA | 306 (84%) | 60 (16%) | 366 |
| dICA | 275 (76%) | 86 (24%) | 361 |
| Basilar | 185 (51%) | 179 (49%) | 364 |
| Bifurcation | 146 (41%) | 212 (59%) | 358 |
| Vertebral | 203 (29%) | 255 (71%) | 358 |
| Numerical velocities supplied | Yes | No | Partial |
| 335 (86%) | 24 (6%) | 32 (8%) | |
| Classification based on TAMMV | Yes | No | Unknown |
| 162 (42%) | 23 (6%) | 200 (52%) | |
| Peak velocities assessed‡ | Yes | No | Unknown |
| 123 (33%) | 246 (37%) | ||
| Peak velocities noted in impression | 52 (42%) | 71 (58%) | |
ACA, anterior cerebral artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery.
TCD type as entered directly into the database by the investigator uploading the report to DISPLACE database, not based on what is reported in the report itself.
Total evaluable for each vessel includes only those that identified the vessels used. The total number is not the same for each row.
Does not equal 100% as not all reports included numerical values or stated what they were measuring.