Table 5.

VAF less than 1% by best response on treatment


Matrix
Observed outcome by best response on treatmentRisk difference in comparison with patients with best response of NR
CRCRhCRLNRCR vs NRCRh vs NRCRL vs NR
Marrow subgroup, n 90 26 58 272    
Marrow VAF <1%,
% (95% CI) 
34.4% (24.7-45.2) 26.9% (11.6-47.8) 8.6% (2.9-19.0) 3.3% (1.5-6.2) 31.1 (21.1-41.2) 23.6 (6.4-40.8) 5.3 (–2.2 to 12.8) 
Peripheral blood subgroup, n 127 32 57 331    
Peripheral blood VAF <1%, % (95% CI) 40.2% (31.6-49.2) 21.9% (9.3-40.0) 7.0% (1.9-17.0) 4.5% (2.6-7.4) 35.6 (26.8-44.4) 17.3 (2.8-31.8) 2.5 (–4.5 to 9.5) 

Matrix
Observed outcome by best response on treatmentRisk difference in comparison with patients with best response of NR
CRCRhCRLNRCR vs NRCRh vs NRCRL vs NR
Marrow subgroup, n 90 26 58 272    
Marrow VAF <1%,
% (95% CI) 
34.4% (24.7-45.2) 26.9% (11.6-47.8) 8.6% (2.9-19.0) 3.3% (1.5-6.2) 31.1 (21.1-41.2) 23.6 (6.4-40.8) 5.3 (–2.2 to 12.8) 
Peripheral blood subgroup, n 127 32 57 331    
Peripheral blood VAF <1%, % (95% CI) 40.2% (31.6-49.2) 21.9% (9.3-40.0) 7.0% (1.9-17.0) 4.5% (2.6-7.4) 35.6 (26.8-44.4) 17.3 (2.8-31.8) 2.5 (–4.5 to 9.5) 

See supplemental Table 2 for details.

%, percentage of patients with the VAF <1% on treatment; n, number of patients with the disease response listed in the column header in the marrow or peripheral blood cohort tested for VAF; VAF, variant allele frequency for the allele identified by the companion diagnostic assay at study baseline.

P < .01 for comparison with NR by logistic regression adjusting for drug and baseline transfusion dependence status.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal