Table 2. Factors influencing mentee... | American Society of Hematology

Table 2.

Factors influencing mentee survey respondent (n = 32) perception of program in the mentee 1-year survey

Factor		Mentee outcome	P value
	My assigned mentor was a good match
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)
No. of prior mentees that mentor had∗	Mentor with >6 mentees	93% (14/15)	1.000
	Mentor with <6 mentees	100% (12/12)
Mentor duration of time as faculty member∗	>10 y	94% (16/17)	1.000
	<10 y	100% (10/10)

Factor		Mentee outcome	P value
	My assigned mentor was a good match
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)
No. of prior mentees that mentor had∗	Mentor with >6 mentees	93% (14/15)	1.000
	Mentor with <6 mentees	100% (12/12)
Mentor duration of time as faculty member∗	>10 y	94% (16/17)	1.000
	<10 y	100% (10/10)

	Frequency of communication with my mentor was adequate		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Frequency of communication reported by mentee	Less than once a month	50% (8/16)	.0155†
	At least once a month or more	94% (15/16)

	Frequency of communication with my mentor was adequate		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Frequency of communication reported by mentee	Less than once a month	50% (8/16)	.0155†
	At least once a month or more	94% (15/16)

	Participation in this program increased my academic productivity		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	70% (14/20)	.7026
	No	58% (7/12)
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	50% (1/2)	.5047
	Second-year fellow	78% (7/9)
	Third-year fellow	69% (11/16)
	Postfellowship	40% (2/5)
Mentee participated in prior formal research program	Yes	57% (8/14)	.4651
	No	72% (13/18)
Mentee participated in prior formal CH program	Yes	57% (4/7)	.6675
	No	68% (17/25)
Mentee prior publications in CH	Yes	59% (10/17)	.3885
	No	73% (11/15)

	Participation in this program increased my academic productivity		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	70% (14/20)	.7026
	No	58% (7/12)
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	50% (1/2)	.5047
	Second-year fellow	78% (7/9)
	Third-year fellow	69% (11/16)
	Postfellowship	40% (2/5)
Mentee participated in prior formal research program	Yes	57% (8/14)	.4651
	No	72% (13/18)
Mentee participated in prior formal CH program	Yes	57% (4/7)	.6675
	No	68% (17/25)
Mentee prior publications in CH	Yes	59% (10/17)	.3885
	No	73% (11/15)

	I connected with other faculty besides my assigned mentor		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Type of fellowship that mentee is in	Adult	60% (6/10)	1.000
	Pediatric	59% (13/22)

	I connected with other faculty besides my assigned mentor		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Type of fellowship that mentee is in	Adult	60% (6/10)	1.000
	Pediatric	59% (13/22)

	I connected with other trainees during this program		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Type of fellowship that mentee is in	Adult	20% (2/10)	.6367
	Pediatric	14% (3/22)

	I connected with other trainees during this program		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Type of fellowship that mentee is in	Adult	20% (2/10)	.6367
	Pediatric	14% (3/22)

	Participation in this program improved my confidence in pursuing a career in CH		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	75% (15/20)	.6833
	No	83% (10/12)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was good match	Strongly agree + agree	83% (25/30)	.0423†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

	Participation in this program improved my confidence in pursuing a career in CH		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	75% (15/20)	.6833
	No	83% (10/12)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was good match	Strongly agree + agree	83% (25/30)	.0423†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

	Participation in this program facilitated my career development		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	100% (2/2)	1.000
	Second-year fellow	78% (7/9)
	Third-year fellow	75% (12/16)
	Postfellowship	80% (4/5)
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	80% (16/20)	1.000
	No	75% (9/12)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was a good match	Strongly agree + agree	83% (25/30)	.0423†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

	Participation in this program facilitated my career development		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	100% (2/2)	1.000
	Second-year fellow	78% (7/9)
	Third-year fellow	75% (12/16)
	Postfellowship	80% (4/5)
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	80% (16/20)	1.000
	No	75% (9/12)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was a good match	Strongly agree + agree	83% (25/30)	.0423†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

	Participation in this program impacted my sense of professional identity		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	50% (1/2)	.7261
	Second-year fellow	89% (8/9)
	Third-year fellow	81% (13/16)
	Postfellowship	80% (4/5)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was a good match	Strongly agree + agree	87% (26/30)	.0302†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

	Participation in this program impacted my sense of professional identity		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	50% (1/2)	.7261
	Second-year fellow	89% (8/9)
	Third-year fellow	81% (13/16)
	Postfellowship	80% (4/5)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was a good match	Strongly agree + agree	87% (26/30)	.0302†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

	I was glad I participated in this program		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee participated in prior formal research program	Yes	79% (11/14)	.2951
	No	94% (17/18)
Mentee participated in prior formal CH program	Yes	71% (5/7)	.2005
	No	92% (23/25)
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	85% (17/20)	1.000
	No	92% (11/12)
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	100% (2/2)	.3715
	Second-year fellow	100% (9/9)
	Third-year fellow	75% (12/16)
	Postfellowship	100% (5/5)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was a good match	Strongly agree + agree	93% (28/30)	.0121†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

	I was glad I participated in this program		P value
		Strongly agree or agree % (n/N)	P value
Mentee participated in prior formal research program	Yes	79% (11/14)	.2951
	No	94% (17/18)
Mentee participated in prior formal CH program	Yes	71% (5/7)	.2005
	No	92% (23/25)
Mentee participation in scholarly project	Yes	85% (17/20)	1.000
	No	92% (11/12)
Mentee stage of training	First-year fellow	100% (2/2)	.3715
	Second-year fellow	100% (9/9)
	Third-year fellow	75% (12/16)
	Postfellowship	100% (5/5)
Mentee perception of whether mentor was a good match	Strongly agree + agree	93% (28/30)	.0121†
	Neutral + disagree + strongly disagree	0% (0/2)

Data obtained from mentor 1-year survey; only mentees with mentors who completed the mentor survey (n = 27 mentees) were included in this analysis.

Boldface P values represent statistical significance.