Table 2.

Transplant characteristics

n (%)
No. of transplants 944 
No. of patients 874 
Donor type  
Matched donors 623 (65.89) 
MSD 232 
MFD 65 
MUD 325 
Mismatched donors 322 (34.11) 
MMUD 239 
MMSD and MMFD 16 
Haploidentical 67 
Stem cell source  
BM 526 (55.72) 
PBSCs 302 (31.99) 
Cord 116 (12.29) 
Preparative conditioning regimens  
MAC 416 (44.07) 
Bu-based conditioning 220 
Bu/Flu ± Cyc/Mel 58 
Bu/Cyc ± Mel 162 
Treo-based conditioning 56 
Treo/Flu ± TT 39 
Treo/Cy/Mel 17 
TBI conditioning 121 
TBI (12 Gy)/Cyc ± Flu 84 
TBI (12 Gy)/etoposide 33 
TBI (12 Gy)/Flu/TT 
Others 19 
Flu/Mel/TT 
Carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/Mel 
RIC 408 (43.22) 
Treo/Flu 125 
Bu/Flu 41 
Flu/Mel ± anti-CD66 187 
Flu/cytarabine ± low dose TBI 
Other 10 
MIC 96 (10.28) 
Flu/Cyc ± low dose TBI or ± anti-CD45 67 
Cyc alone 14 
Flu/low dose TBI 
Cyc/low dose TBI 
No conditioning 66 (6.99) 
GVHD prophylaxis regimens 884 (93.65) 
CSA based 869 (92.06) 
CSA 234 
CSA/MMF ± MP 422 
CSA/MTX 212 
CSA/OKT3 
Tacrolimus-based 5 (0.53) 
Tac 
Tac/MMF 
Tac/MTX 
Sirolimus based 4 (0.42) 
Sirolimus/MMF 
Others 6 (0.64) 
MMF 
MMF/OKT3 
MP 
In vivo T-cell depletion 620 (64.83) 
Alemtuzumab (0.3-1 mg/kg) 491 
rATG (4-60 mg/kg) 121 
n (%)
No. of transplants 944 
No. of patients 874 
Donor type  
Matched donors 623 (65.89) 
MSD 232 
MFD 65 
MUD 325 
Mismatched donors 322 (34.11) 
MMUD 239 
MMSD and MMFD 16 
Haploidentical 67 
Stem cell source  
BM 526 (55.72) 
PBSCs 302 (31.99) 
Cord 116 (12.29) 
Preparative conditioning regimens  
MAC 416 (44.07) 
Bu-based conditioning 220 
Bu/Flu ± Cyc/Mel 58 
Bu/Cyc ± Mel 162 
Treo-based conditioning 56 
Treo/Flu ± TT 39 
Treo/Cy/Mel 17 
TBI conditioning 121 
TBI (12 Gy)/Cyc ± Flu 84 
TBI (12 Gy)/etoposide 33 
TBI (12 Gy)/Flu/TT 
Others 19 
Flu/Mel/TT 
Carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/Mel 
RIC 408 (43.22) 
Treo/Flu 125 
Bu/Flu 41 
Flu/Mel ± anti-CD66 187 
Flu/cytarabine ± low dose TBI 
Other 10 
MIC 96 (10.28) 
Flu/Cyc ± low dose TBI or ± anti-CD45 67 
Cyc alone 14 
Flu/low dose TBI 
Cyc/low dose TBI 
No conditioning 66 (6.99) 
GVHD prophylaxis regimens 884 (93.65) 
CSA based 869 (92.06) 
CSA 234 
CSA/MMF ± MP 422 
CSA/MTX 212 
CSA/OKT3 
Tacrolimus-based 5 (0.53) 
Tac 
Tac/MMF 
Tac/MTX 
Sirolimus based 4 (0.42) 
Sirolimus/MMF 
Others 6 (0.64) 
MMF 
MMF/OKT3 
MP 
In vivo T-cell depletion 620 (64.83) 
Alemtuzumab (0.3-1 mg/kg) 491 
rATG (4-60 mg/kg) 121 

Patients receiving Bu-based conditioning had either RIC conditioning with Bu AUC levels of 45 to 65 mg × h/L or MAC conditioning with Bu AUC ≥70 mg × h/L.

AUC, area under the curve; Bu, busulfan; Cyc, cyclophosphamide; CSA, cyclosporine; Flu, fludarabine; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; Mel, melphalan; MFD, matched family donor; MIC, minimal-intensity conditioning; MP, methylprednisolone; MSD, matched sibling donor; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MMFD, mismatched family donor; MMSD, mismatched sibling donor; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; MTX, methotrexate; MUD, matched unrelated donor; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cell; OKT3, anti-CD3; rATG, rabbit antithymocyte globulin; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning; Tac, tacrolimus Treo, treosulfan; TT, thiotepa.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal