Table 1.

Baseline characteristics for the assessable cohort of patients on the clinical trial

PatientAge at diagnosis, ySexBaseline Hb, gm/dLBaseline PLTs, ×109 per literBaseline ANC, ×109 per literBaseline AMC, ×109 per literBaseline monocyte %AA deficiency at baselineNo. of somatic MTs at time of enrollmentTET2 MT and VAF, %Somatic co-MTsBone marrow karyotype at enrollmentBone marrow atypia at enrollmentBone marrow cellularity at enrollmentClinical outcomes
73.8 12.5 81 1.2 0.4 14.7% Q1555V (36%) SRSF2
P95L (42%) 
46, XY [20] Slight Hypercellularity (60%) Week 20:
ANC improvement from CTACE grade 2 to grade 1. Duration of improvement: 18 d 
69.1 13.5 134 0.7 0.6 25.7% Y163L (31%) — 46, XX [20] None Normal cellularity Stable disease at week 20 and week 52, and ANC showed a durable improvement from week 52 onward 
77.4 12.1 117 0.8 0.2 12% N275I (60%) ZRSR2
K98Nfs∗10 (27%) 
46, XY [20] None Hypercellularity (40%) Week 20:
ANC improvement from CTACE grade 3 to grade 2. Duration of improvement: 119 d. 
64.7 13.1 32 0.8 0.4 17.5% Y R1808∗ (15%) SRSF2
P95L (43%) 
46, XY,del(20)(q11.2q13.3)[1]/46,XY[16] Slight Hypercellularity (—) Week 20:
Met fourth edition WHO criteria for CMML-1 
73.7 13.6 72 1.0 0.2 11.8% N1743I (51%)
R1214W (16%) 
SRSF2
P95R (40%) 
46, XY [20] Moderate Normal cellularity Withdrew from the study due to PICC line thrombosis 
67.4 7.8 409 4.9 0.4 4.5% L1447R (45%) SRSF2
P95H (49.9%) 
46, XY [20] Slight Hypercellularity (—) Stable disease at week 20 and week 52 
77.3 12.8 172 0.3 0.5 25.5% R250∗ (39%) ASXL1
L732Yfs∗12 (39%);
ZRSR2
Y347Tfs∗? (73%) 
46, XY [20] Slight Hypercellularity (60%) Week 20:
Progression to MDS-EB-1 
79.0 14.8 39 1.9 0.8 22.9% Y C1378Lfs∗70 (39%) SRSF2
P95H (28%) 
46, XX [20] None Hypercellularity (35%) Stable disease at week 20 and week 52 
10 64.9 12.1 100 0.3 0.7 38.9% G259∗ c.3955-1G>A (39%) ZRSR2
E49∗ (74%) 
45, X, –Y [20] Slight Hypercellularity (—) Stable disease at week 20, with progression to MDS-EB-1 at week 52 
PatientAge at diagnosis, ySexBaseline Hb, gm/dLBaseline PLTs, ×109 per literBaseline ANC, ×109 per literBaseline AMC, ×109 per literBaseline monocyte %AA deficiency at baselineNo. of somatic MTs at time of enrollmentTET2 MT and VAF, %Somatic co-MTsBone marrow karyotype at enrollmentBone marrow atypia at enrollmentBone marrow cellularity at enrollmentClinical outcomes
73.8 12.5 81 1.2 0.4 14.7% Q1555V (36%) SRSF2
P95L (42%) 
46, XY [20] Slight Hypercellularity (60%) Week 20:
ANC improvement from CTACE grade 2 to grade 1. Duration of improvement: 18 d 
69.1 13.5 134 0.7 0.6 25.7% Y163L (31%) — 46, XX [20] None Normal cellularity Stable disease at week 20 and week 52, and ANC showed a durable improvement from week 52 onward 
77.4 12.1 117 0.8 0.2 12% N275I (60%) ZRSR2
K98Nfs∗10 (27%) 
46, XY [20] None Hypercellularity (40%) Week 20:
ANC improvement from CTACE grade 3 to grade 2. Duration of improvement: 119 d. 
64.7 13.1 32 0.8 0.4 17.5% Y R1808∗ (15%) SRSF2
P95L (43%) 
46, XY,del(20)(q11.2q13.3)[1]/46,XY[16] Slight Hypercellularity (—) Week 20:
Met fourth edition WHO criteria for CMML-1 
73.7 13.6 72 1.0 0.2 11.8% N1743I (51%)
R1214W (16%) 
SRSF2
P95R (40%) 
46, XY [20] Moderate Normal cellularity Withdrew from the study due to PICC line thrombosis 
67.4 7.8 409 4.9 0.4 4.5% L1447R (45%) SRSF2
P95H (49.9%) 
46, XY [20] Slight Hypercellularity (—) Stable disease at week 20 and week 52 
77.3 12.8 172 0.3 0.5 25.5% R250∗ (39%) ASXL1
L732Yfs∗12 (39%);
ZRSR2
Y347Tfs∗? (73%) 
46, XY [20] Slight Hypercellularity (60%) Week 20:
Progression to MDS-EB-1 
79.0 14.8 39 1.9 0.8 22.9% Y C1378Lfs∗70 (39%) SRSF2
P95H (28%) 
46, XX [20] None Hypercellularity (35%) Stable disease at week 20 and week 52 
10 64.9 12.1 100 0.3 0.7 38.9% G259∗ c.3955-1G>A (39%) ZRSR2
E49∗ (74%) 
45, X, –Y [20] Slight Hypercellularity (—) Stable disease at week 20, with progression to MDS-EB-1 at week 52 

(−) indicates the percentage of cellularity was not reported.

Both patients 4 and 9 had baseline AA levels of 0.2 mg/dL.

Although patients 2, 9, and 10 had AMC >0.5 × 109 per liter and <1.0 × 109 per liter, they did not meet CMML diagnostic criteria per the revised fourth edition of the WHO criteria (2016), which we used for inclusion criteria in this study. These criteria were revised in 2022 by the ICC and WHO, lowering the AMC threshold for CMML to ≥0.5 ×109 per liter. The high number of patients with monocytosis is likely due to the well-established mechanism(s) by which TET2 MTs, especially biallelic TET2 MTs or TET2/SRSF2 co-MTs, result in epigenetic dysregulation, clonal hematopoietic stem cell dominance, and monocytic lineage skewing (granulocyte-monocyte progenitor–biased hematopoiesis).16 Although patient 7 exhibited relative and absolute monocytosis, with WBC 13.7 × 109 per liter and TET2, SRSF2, and KRAS MTs, on bone marrow biopsy review, no bone marrow dysplasia/atypia was found, and this patient had a classical monocyte fraction (M01) <94% by monocyte repartitioning flow cytometry.17,18 The final diagnosis by the pathologist was TET2, SRSF2, and KRAS mutant CCUS; however, we excluded this patient from our analyses.

∗10 indicates that the frameshift leads to a premature stop codon 10 amino acids downstream from the mutation, causing the protein to be truncated early.

∗∗? indicates uncertainty about where the stop codon occurs after the frameshift.

AMC, absolute monocyte count; F, female; ICC, International Consensus Classification; M, male; N, no; WBC, white blood cell; WHO, World Health Organization; Y, yes.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal