Table 4.

Prognostic value of baseline SUVmax in FL

StudyType of studyNo patientsHTPFS
Strati et al53  Retrospective 346 18 pts (5%) with HT: 12 HT in SUVmax < 18 and 6 (11%) in SUVmax > 18 (P  =  .04) Inferior OS in SUVmax >18 
GALLIUM54  Clinical trial 549 15 pts (2.7%) with HT: no difference in SUVmax No association of bSUVmax with PFS 
PET in PRIMA55  Retrospective 58 No pts with HT No association of bSUVmax with PFS 
FOLLCOLL56  Retrospective 181 2 pts with HT Inferior PFS in SUVmax < 9.4, no difference in OS 
RELEVANCE58  Clinical trial 406 No evaluated No association of bSUVmax with PFS 
Trotman et al59  Clinical trials 439 Not reported Inferior OS in PET+ 
StudyType of studyNo patientsHTPFS
Strati et al53  Retrospective 346 18 pts (5%) with HT: 12 HT in SUVmax < 18 and 6 (11%) in SUVmax > 18 (P  =  .04) Inferior OS in SUVmax >18 
GALLIUM54  Clinical trial 549 15 pts (2.7%) with HT: no difference in SUVmax No association of bSUVmax with PFS 
PET in PRIMA55  Retrospective 58 No pts with HT No association of bSUVmax with PFS 
FOLLCOLL56  Retrospective 181 2 pts with HT Inferior PFS in SUVmax < 9.4, no difference in OS 
RELEVANCE58  Clinical trial 406 No evaluated No association of bSUVmax with PFS 
Trotman et al59  Clinical trials 439 Not reported Inferior OS in PET+ 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal