Table 3.

Subgroup analyses on the association between Medicaid enrollment patterns and the likelihood of stage IV diagnoses among Medicaid-insured children and AYAs diagnosed with lymphoma, by key sociodemographic characteristics

CharacteristicsLikelihood of stage IV diagnoses
ME95% CIP value
By age group    
Among 0-14 (n = 465)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 7.7 (–4.3 to 19.6) .21 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 12.1 (–0.2 to 24.5) .05 
Among 15-25 (n = 1290)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 15.4 (10.5 to 20.3) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 1.4 (–2.8 to 5.5) .52 
Among 26-39 (n = 1769)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 12.2 (4.8 to 19.5) .001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 4.3 (–2.4 to 10.9) .21 
By sex    
Among male (n = 1899)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 15.8 (9.5 to 22.1) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 7.4 (3.8 to 11.1) <.001 
Among female (n = 1625)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 11.4 (5.0 to 17.8) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 2.3 (–1.1 to 5.6) .18 
By race/ethnicity    
Among non-Hispanic White patients (n = 1564)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 13.5 (8.3 to 18.8) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 4.5 (–0.8 to 9.7) .10 
Among non-Hispanic Black patients (n = 858)     
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 18.8 (7.8 to 29.7) .001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 6.2 (–1.4 to 13.8) .11 
Among Hispanic patients (n = 875)     
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 10.5 (–1.6 to 22.6) .09 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 5.0 (0.4 to 9.7) .03 
By neighborhood SES quantiles    
Among Q4-5 (high SES) (n = 951)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 14.7 (10.6 to 18.8) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 8.2 (5.2 to 11.2) <.001 
Among Q1-3 (low SES) (n = 2521)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 13.7 (6.1 to 21.4) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 2.9 (–0.6 to 6.4) .10 
CharacteristicsLikelihood of stage IV diagnoses
ME95% CIP value
By age group    
Among 0-14 (n = 465)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 7.7 (–4.3 to 19.6) .21 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 12.1 (–0.2 to 24.5) .05 
Among 15-25 (n = 1290)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 15.4 (10.5 to 20.3) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 1.4 (–2.8 to 5.5) .52 
Among 26-39 (n = 1769)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 12.2 (4.8 to 19.5) .001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 4.3 (–2.4 to 10.9) .21 
By sex    
Among male (n = 1899)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 15.8 (9.5 to 22.1) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 7.4 (3.8 to 11.1) <.001 
Among female (n = 1625)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 11.4 (5.0 to 17.8) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 2.3 (–1.1 to 5.6) .18 
By race/ethnicity    
Among non-Hispanic White patients (n = 1564)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 13.5 (8.3 to 18.8) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 4.5 (–0.8 to 9.7) .10 
Among non-Hispanic Black patients (n = 858)     
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 18.8 (7.8 to 29.7) .001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 6.2 (–1.4 to 13.8) .11 
Among Hispanic patients (n = 875)     
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 10.5 (–1.6 to 22.6) .09 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 5.0 (0.4 to 9.7) .03 
By neighborhood SES quantiles    
Among Q4-5 (high SES) (n = 951)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 14.7 (10.6 to 18.8) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 8.2 (5.2 to 11.2) <.001 
Among Q1-3 (low SES) (n = 2521)    
Continuous Medicaid Ref.   
Newly gained Medicaid 13.7 (6.1 to 21.4) <.001 
Other Medicaid enrollment patterns 2.9 (–0.6 to 6.4) .10 

Authors’ analysis of the 2006 to 2013 SEER-Medicaid data. All regression models also controlled for age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, year of diagnosis, rurality of residence, and neighborhood-level SES, as appropriate, as well as SEER cancer registries. Standard errors were clustered by SEER cancer registries.

Ref., reference group.

Three observations were dropped from the regression model because of the perfect prediction issue (ie, only 1 non-Hispanic Black patient was in the Hawaii registry who had stage IV lymphoma at diagnosis, and none of the 2 non-Hispanic Black patients in the Utah registry had stage IV lymphoma at diagnosis).

One observation was dropped from the regression model because of the perfect prediction issue (ie, only 1 Hispanic patient was in the Kentucky registry who did not have stage IV lymphoma at diagnosis).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal