Selected studies comparing Aza/VEN with other therapies in AML

StudyTrial typeAza/VEN responseComparatorComparator responseComment
Dinardo et al2  Randomized
frontline 
OS, 14.7 months Aza OS, 9.6 months Best response: IDH1, IDH2, FLT3, and NPM1 
Cherry et al4  Retrospective
frontline 
OS, 884 days
PMC, NR 
IC OS, 484 days
PMC, 705 days 
OS advantage in IC; but in PMC trend to OS advantage in Aza/VEN 
Matthews et al6  Retrospective frontline OS, 11 months CPX-351 OS, 13 months Longer HLOS and more infections in CPX-351 Arm 
Pelland et al8  RetrospectiveR/R OS, 6.8 months “other salvage” OS, 11.2 months No difference in infectious complications 
Maiti et al5  RetrospectiveR/R  OS, 6.8 months IC OS, 4.7 months  
Unglaub et al1  Retrospective OS, 15.8 months
Bridge to allo, 73% 
Non-VEN salvage OS, 10.5 months
Bridge to allo, 63% 
PMC showed trend to OS advantage of Aza-VEN 
StudyTrial typeAza/VEN responseComparatorComparator responseComment
Dinardo et al2  Randomized
frontline 
OS, 14.7 months Aza OS, 9.6 months Best response: IDH1, IDH2, FLT3, and NPM1 
Cherry et al4  Retrospective
frontline 
OS, 884 days
PMC, NR 
IC OS, 484 days
PMC, 705 days 
OS advantage in IC; but in PMC trend to OS advantage in Aza/VEN 
Matthews et al6  Retrospective frontline OS, 11 months CPX-351 OS, 13 months Longer HLOS and more infections in CPX-351 Arm 
Pelland et al8  RetrospectiveR/R OS, 6.8 months “other salvage” OS, 11.2 months No difference in infectious complications 
Maiti et al5  RetrospectiveR/R  OS, 6.8 months IC OS, 4.7 months  
Unglaub et al1  Retrospective OS, 15.8 months
Bridge to allo, 73% 
Non-VEN salvage OS, 10.5 months
Bridge to allo, 63% 
PMC showed trend to OS advantage of Aza-VEN 

Allo, allogeneic bone marrow transplant; HLOS, hospital length of stay; NR, no response; OS, overall survival; PMC, propensity matched cohort.

Used 10-day decitabine rather than Aza in combination with VEN.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal