Table 4.

Association of SDOH with mortality after allo-HCT (n = 315)

VariableHazard ratio95% CIP valueGlobal P value
Median income 1.00 1.00-1.00 .558  
Proportion with less than a high school education 1.18 0.87-1.60 .283  
Proportion below federal poverty level 1.04 0.79-1.36 .804  
Proportion on SNAP 1.13 0.92-1.38 .240  
Proportion spending ≥30% of their income on housing 1.03 0.78-1.35 .845  
Proportion with a second mortgage or a home equity loan 0.99 0.73-1.36 .970  
Proportion on SSI 1.21 0.81-1.82 .345  
Proportion driving to work alone 0.96 0.85-1.10 .570  
Race     
White  --- .722 
Asian 0.91 0.40-2.09   
Black 0.98 0.45-2.17   
Other 0.44 0.11-1.80   
Race      
White  --- .528 
Asian 0.80 0.35-1.81   
Black 0.77 0.36-1.65   
Other 0.41 0.10-1.65   
VariableHazard ratio95% CIP valueGlobal P value
Median income 1.00 1.00-1.00 .558  
Proportion with less than a high school education 1.18 0.87-1.60 .283  
Proportion below federal poverty level 1.04 0.79-1.36 .804  
Proportion on SNAP 1.13 0.92-1.38 .240  
Proportion spending ≥30% of their income on housing 1.03 0.78-1.35 .845  
Proportion with a second mortgage or a home equity loan 0.99 0.73-1.36 .970  
Proportion on SSI 1.21 0.81-1.82 .345  
Proportion driving to work alone 0.96 0.85-1.10 .570  
Race     
White  --- .722 
Asian 0.91 0.40-2.09   
Black 0.98 0.45-2.17   
Other 0.44 0.11-1.80   
Race      
White  --- .528 
Asian 0.80 0.35-1.81   
Black 0.77 0.36-1.65   
Other 0.41 0.10-1.65   

Each row represents 1 model for 1 SDOH variable adjusted for age and HCT-CI; each as a continuous linear variable; relapsed/refractory AML vs newly diagnosed, intermediate vs unfavorable cytogenetics, status at HCT (CR1 vs other), and intensity of induction therapy.

Unadjusted model (univariate analysis).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal