Table 2.

Distribution of outpatient anticoagulant use and DOAC use according to income of country in which institutions were based

CharacteristicHICs (n = 59)LMICs (n = 26)P value 
Outpatient anticoagulant use (median proportion, Q1-Q3)    
DOACs 45 (25-64) 18 (5-53) .02 for the interaction (see supplemental Appendix 2) 
LMWH 30 (15-47) 47 (15-70)  
VKAs 10 (10-25) 15 (6-30)  
Percentage started on DOACs, n (%)    
0-10 34 (58) 19 (73) .47 
11 to <25 9 (15) 2 (8)  
25 to <50 11 (19) 2 (8)  
50 to <75 2 (3) 2 (8)  
≥75 3 (5) 1 (3)  
Percentage on long-term VKA/LMWH switched to DOACs, n (%)     
0-10 14 (24) 11 (44) .20 
11 to <25 13 (22) 2 (8)  
25 to <50 8 (13) 5 (20)  
50 to <75 14 (24) 3 (12)  
≥75 10 (17) 4 (16)  
CharacteristicHICs (n = 59)LMICs (n = 26)P value 
Outpatient anticoagulant use (median proportion, Q1-Q3)    
DOACs 45 (25-64) 18 (5-53) .02 for the interaction (see supplemental Appendix 2) 
LMWH 30 (15-47) 47 (15-70)  
VKAs 10 (10-25) 15 (6-30)  
Percentage started on DOACs, n (%)    
0-10 34 (58) 19 (73) .47 
11 to <25 9 (15) 2 (8)  
25 to <50 11 (19) 2 (8)  
50 to <75 2 (3) 2 (8)  
≥75 3 (5) 1 (3)  
Percentage on long-term VKA/LMWH switched to DOACs, n (%)     
0-10 14 (24) 11 (44) .20 
11 to <25 13 (22) 2 (8)  
25 to <50 8 (13) 5 (20)  
50 to <75 14 (24) 3 (12)  
≥75 10 (17) 4 (16)  

Fisher exact test.

“I don’t know” for n = 1.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal