Table 5.

Results from logistic regression analyses, modeling odds of a repeat thrombosis

EffectReferenceOR (95% CI)P value
Full model 
Anatomic venous abnormality, yes No 2.8 (1.37-5.59) .004 
IBD, yes No 3.0 (1.14-7.99) .027 
IF, yes No 2.2 (0.85-5.45) .107 
CVC, yes No 1.5 (0.86-2.61) .155 
Congenital thrombophilia, no Yes 1.8 (0.80-3.91) .161 
Hospital at the time of first thrombosis, in Out 1.5 (0.82-2.67) .199 
Reduced model 
CVC, yes No 2.0 (1.21-3.26) .006 
Anatomic venous abnormality, yes No 2.3 (1.22-4.47) .011 
IBD, yes No 3.1 (1.18-7.98) .022 
EffectReferenceOR (95% CI)P value
Full model 
Anatomic venous abnormality, yes No 2.8 (1.37-5.59) .004 
IBD, yes No 3.0 (1.14-7.99) .027 
IF, yes No 2.2 (0.85-5.45) .107 
CVC, yes No 1.5 (0.86-2.61) .155 
Congenital thrombophilia, no Yes 1.8 (0.80-3.91) .161 
Hospital at the time of first thrombosis, in Out 1.5 (0.82-2.67) .199 
Reduced model 
CVC, yes No 2.0 (1.21-3.26) .006 
Anatomic venous abnormality, yes No 2.3 (1.22-4.47) .011 
IBD, yes No 3.1 (1.18-7.98) .022 

Initial predictors (full model) were included based on univariate results (Table 4). Final model includes only significant predictors after using backward elimination.

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal