Table 4.

Success rates in the primary analysis population




Deferasirox

Deferoxamine
All LIC values   
    No. patients   276   277  
    Success rate, no. (%)   146 (52.9)   184 (66.4)  
    95% CI   47.0, 58.8   60.9, 72.0  
LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   
    No. patients   85   87  
    Success rate, no. (%)   34 (40.0)   72 (82.8)  
    95% CI   29.6, 50.4   74.8, 90.7  
LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw   
    No. patients   191   190  
    Success rate, no. (%)   112 (58.6)   112 (58.9)  
    95% CI
 
51.7, 65.6
 
52.0, 65.9
 



Deferasirox

Deferoxamine
All LIC values   
    No. patients   276   277  
    Success rate, no. (%)   146 (52.9)   184 (66.4)  
    95% CI   47.0, 58.8   60.9, 72.0  
LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   
    No. patients   85   87  
    Success rate, no. (%)   34 (40.0)   72 (82.8)  
    95% CI   29.6, 50.4   74.8, 90.7  
LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw   
    No. patients   191   190  
    Success rate, no. (%)   112 (58.6)   112 (58.9)  
    95% CI
 
51.7, 65.6
 
52.0, 65.9
 

For all LIC values, the difference and 95% CI were -13.5 (-21.6, -5.4); for LIC values less than 7 mg Fe/g dw, they were -42.8 (-55.9, -29.7); and for LIC values of at least 7 mg Fe/g dw, they were -0.3 (-10.2, 9.6). The prespecified boundary for noninferiority in the entire population was met in population of patients with LIC of at least 7 mg Fe/g dw who received 20 and 30 mg/kg doses of deferasirox. If patients in this group with biopsy only are included, the success rate for deferasirox (n = 176) was 59.7% and that with deferoxamine (n = 179) was 58.7%. The difference and 95% CI were 1.0 (-9.2, 11.2).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal