Table 5.

Absolute changes in LIC values



No. Patients (means ± SD)

Deferasirox
Deferoxamine
No. patients   268   273  
Patients evaluated by biopsy or SQUID   
    All LIC values   268 (-2.4 ± 8.2)   273 (-2.9 ± 5.4)  
    LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   83 (4.0 ± 3.8)   87 (0.13 ± 2.2)  
    LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw   185 (-5.3 ± 8.0)*  186 (-4.3 ± 5.8)  
Patients evaluated by biopsy only   
    All LIC values   224 (-3.0 ± 8.8)   230 (-3.2 ± 5.7)  
    LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   52 (5.6 ± 3.8)   55 (0.5 ± 2.5)  
    LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw   172 (-5.6 ± 8.2)*  175 (-4.4 ± 6.0)  
Patients evaluated by SQUID only   
    All LIC values   44 (0.5 ± 2.9)   43 (-1.1 ± 1.9)  
    LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   31 (1.4 ± 2.1)   32 (-0.5 ± 1.3)  
    LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw
 
13 (-1.5 ± 3.7)
 
11 (-2.9 ± 2.3)
 


No. Patients (means ± SD)

Deferasirox
Deferoxamine
No. patients   268   273  
Patients evaluated by biopsy or SQUID   
    All LIC values   268 (-2.4 ± 8.2)   273 (-2.9 ± 5.4)  
    LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   83 (4.0 ± 3.8)   87 (0.13 ± 2.2)  
    LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw   185 (-5.3 ± 8.0)*  186 (-4.3 ± 5.8)  
Patients evaluated by biopsy only   
    All LIC values   224 (-3.0 ± 8.8)   230 (-3.2 ± 5.7)  
    LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   52 (5.6 ± 3.8)   55 (0.5 ± 2.5)  
    LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw   172 (-5.6 ± 8.2)*  175 (-4.4 ± 6.0)  
Patients evaluated by SQUID only   
    All LIC values   44 (0.5 ± 2.9)   43 (-1.1 ± 1.9)  
    LIC below 7 mg Fe/g dw   31 (1.4 ± 2.1)   32 (-0.5 ± 1.3)  
    LIC at least 7 mg Fe/g dw
 
13 (-1.5 ± 3.7)
 
11 (-2.9 ± 2.3)
 
*

P = .001; deferasirox populations with a statistically significant reduction in LIC from baseline; 1-sample Student t test (1-sided, alpha = 2.5%).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal