Table 3.

Studies evaluating the role of maintenance therapy with thalidomide in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Maintenance vs No Maintenance
Cooperative GroupNInitial dose (mg)Duration of T-maintenanceCR+ VGPR, %EFS or PFS, %OS, %Reference
CR indicates complete response; VGPR, very good partial response; EFS, event-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; PD, progression of disease; NA, not available. 
IFM 597 400 Until PD 67 vs 55 3-y EFS 4-y OS Attal et al. Blood. 2006;108:3289–3294 
     52 vs 36 87 vs 77  
Australian 243 200 12 months 63 vs 40 3-y PFS 3-y OS Spencer et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1788–1793 
     42 vs 23 86 vs 75  
Arkansas 668 400 Throughout study 62 vs 43 5-y EFS 5-y OS Barlogie et al. Blood. 2008;112:3115–3121 
     56 vs 45 67 vs 65  
MRC (UK) 820 100 Until PD NA HR:1.9 Similar OS Morgan et al. Blood. 2008;112:656a 
     P =.007   
Maintenance vs No Maintenance
Cooperative GroupNInitial dose (mg)Duration of T-maintenanceCR+ VGPR, %EFS or PFS, %OS, %Reference
CR indicates complete response; VGPR, very good partial response; EFS, event-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; PD, progression of disease; NA, not available. 
IFM 597 400 Until PD 67 vs 55 3-y EFS 4-y OS Attal et al. Blood. 2006;108:3289–3294 
     52 vs 36 87 vs 77  
Australian 243 200 12 months 63 vs 40 3-y PFS 3-y OS Spencer et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1788–1793 
     42 vs 23 86 vs 75  
Arkansas 668 400 Throughout study 62 vs 43 5-y EFS 5-y OS Barlogie et al. Blood. 2008;112:3115–3121 
     56 vs 45 67 vs 65  
MRC (UK) 820 100 Until PD NA HR:1.9 Similar OS Morgan et al. Blood. 2008;112:656a 
     P =.007   
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal