Table 2.

Studies of variable platelet response to clopidogrel with clinical correlation.

Study (year)Patients (no.;% female; mean age, y)Clopidrogel dose (mean follow-up period)Clopidrogel resistance assay (prevalence)Clinical outcome associated with clopidrogel resistance (assay results in stent thrombosis studies)
Adapted from Maree and Fitzgerald, with permission.1  
Abbreviations: PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; STEMI, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; VASP, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein 
Mobley et al39 (2004) Patients undergoing PCI (50; 20; 58) 75 mg daily maintenance 300 mg loading clinician’s discretion 6/12 Optical aggregometry 1 μmol/L ADP; <10% average platelet inhibition (30%) No correlation with major adverse clinical events 
Matetzky et al40 (2004) Patients undergoing primary PCI for acute STEMI (60; 20; 58) 300 mg load post PCI, then 75 mg daily x 3/12 (6 mo) Optical aggregometry 5 μmol/L ADP (1st quartile comparison to remainder) Recurrent cardiovascular events (40% vs 6.7%; P = .007) 
Gurbel et al41 (2005) Patients undergoing PCI (192; 44; 61) 300 mg or 600 mg loading, 75 mg daily (6 mo) Optical aggregometry 5 and 20 μmol/L ADP TEG hemostasis analyzer (upper quartile comparison to remainder) Ischemic events (upper quartile)
 ADP aggregation (63 ± 12% vs 56 ± 15%, P = .02)
 Clot strength (74 ± 5 mm vs 65 ± 4 mm, P < .001)
 Time to fibrin generation (4.3 ± 1.3 min vs 5.9 ± 1.5 min, P < .001) 
Barragan et al42 (2003) Stent thrombosis (<30 d) vs no stent thrombosis (48 [16 cases]; 26; 67) Clopidogrel 75 mg twice daily or ticlopidine 250 mg twice daily Flow cytometric assay VASP phosphorylation (% platelet reactivity) Platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (63.28% ± 9.56% vs 39.8 ± 10.9%; P < .0001) 
Ajzenberg et al43 (2005) Stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (32 [10 cases]; 85; 58) 300 mg load after PCI, then 75 mg daily × 3/12 Coaxial cylinder shearing device
 Shear-induced platelet aggregation Shear 200 S−1 (40.9 ± 12.2% vs18.2 ± 18%, P = .013)
 Shear 4000 S−1 (57.4 ± 16.4% vs 23.4 ± 21.2%, P = .009) 
Gurbel et al44 (2005) Stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (120 [20 cases]; 43; 63) 75 mg daily ± 300 mg loading Optical aggregometry 5 and 20 μmol/L ADP P2Y12 reactivity ratio by VASP phosphorylation Flow cytometry assay of GPIIb/IIIa expression (upper quartile comparison to remainder) 5 μmol/L ADP aggregation (49 ± 4% vs 33 ± 2%; P < .05)
 20 μmol/L ADP aggregation (65 ± 3% vs 51 ± 2%; P < .001)
 P2Y12 reactivity ratio (69 ± 5% vs 46 ± 9%; P = .03)
 Mean fluorescence intensity for stimulated GPIIb/IIIa expression (138 ± 19 vs 42 ± 4; P < .001) 
Buonamici et al45 (2007) Stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (804 [25 cases]; 25; N/A) 600 mg loading, 75mg daily (6 mo) Optical aggregometry 10 μmol/L ADP; aggregation ≥70% (13%) Definite/probable stent thrombosis In responders vs non-responders 16/699 (2.3%) vs 9/105 (8.6%); P < .001 
Study (year)Patients (no.;% female; mean age, y)Clopidrogel dose (mean follow-up period)Clopidrogel resistance assay (prevalence)Clinical outcome associated with clopidrogel resistance (assay results in stent thrombosis studies)
Adapted from Maree and Fitzgerald, with permission.1  
Abbreviations: PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; STEMI, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; VASP, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein 
Mobley et al39 (2004) Patients undergoing PCI (50; 20; 58) 75 mg daily maintenance 300 mg loading clinician’s discretion 6/12 Optical aggregometry 1 μmol/L ADP; <10% average platelet inhibition (30%) No correlation with major adverse clinical events 
Matetzky et al40 (2004) Patients undergoing primary PCI for acute STEMI (60; 20; 58) 300 mg load post PCI, then 75 mg daily x 3/12 (6 mo) Optical aggregometry 5 μmol/L ADP (1st quartile comparison to remainder) Recurrent cardiovascular events (40% vs 6.7%; P = .007) 
Gurbel et al41 (2005) Patients undergoing PCI (192; 44; 61) 300 mg or 600 mg loading, 75 mg daily (6 mo) Optical aggregometry 5 and 20 μmol/L ADP TEG hemostasis analyzer (upper quartile comparison to remainder) Ischemic events (upper quartile)
 ADP aggregation (63 ± 12% vs 56 ± 15%, P = .02)
 Clot strength (74 ± 5 mm vs 65 ± 4 mm, P < .001)
 Time to fibrin generation (4.3 ± 1.3 min vs 5.9 ± 1.5 min, P < .001) 
Barragan et al42 (2003) Stent thrombosis (<30 d) vs no stent thrombosis (48 [16 cases]; 26; 67) Clopidogrel 75 mg twice daily or ticlopidine 250 mg twice daily Flow cytometric assay VASP phosphorylation (% platelet reactivity) Platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (63.28% ± 9.56% vs 39.8 ± 10.9%; P < .0001) 
Ajzenberg et al43 (2005) Stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (32 [10 cases]; 85; 58) 300 mg load after PCI, then 75 mg daily × 3/12 Coaxial cylinder shearing device
 Shear-induced platelet aggregation Shear 200 S−1 (40.9 ± 12.2% vs18.2 ± 18%, P = .013)
 Shear 4000 S−1 (57.4 ± 16.4% vs 23.4 ± 21.2%, P = .009) 
Gurbel et al44 (2005) Stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (120 [20 cases]; 43; 63) 75 mg daily ± 300 mg loading Optical aggregometry 5 and 20 μmol/L ADP P2Y12 reactivity ratio by VASP phosphorylation Flow cytometry assay of GPIIb/IIIa expression (upper quartile comparison to remainder) 5 μmol/L ADP aggregation (49 ± 4% vs 33 ± 2%; P < .05)
 20 μmol/L ADP aggregation (65 ± 3% vs 51 ± 2%; P < .001)
 P2Y12 reactivity ratio (69 ± 5% vs 46 ± 9%; P = .03)
 Mean fluorescence intensity for stimulated GPIIb/IIIa expression (138 ± 19 vs 42 ± 4; P < .001) 
Buonamici et al45 (2007) Stent thrombosis vs no stent thrombosis (804 [25 cases]; 25; N/A) 600 mg loading, 75mg daily (6 mo) Optical aggregometry 10 μmol/L ADP; aggregation ≥70% (13%) Definite/probable stent thrombosis In responders vs non-responders 16/699 (2.3%) vs 9/105 (8.6%); P < .001 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal