Table 4.

Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for inpatient VTE outcome comparing DOAC users to matched control users for the treatment of nonvalvular AF in active cancer patients, MarketScan, 2010-2014

 No. of eventsPerson-yearsNo. of eventsPerson-yearsHR (95% CI)P
 DOAC Warfarin   
Rivaroxaban vs warfarin 66 2085 160 4156 0.73 (0.53, 1.01) .06 
Dabigatran vs warfarin 28 3217 281 8734 0.38 (0.25, 0.57) <.0001 
Apixaban vs warfarin 541 67 1407 0.14 (0.03, 0.59) .008 
 DOAC Rivaroxaban   
Dabigatran vs rivaroxaban 961 15 997 0.37 (0.11, 1.21) .10 
Apixaban vs rivaroxaban 558 43 1004 0.08 (0.02, 0.35) .0008 
 No. of eventsPerson-yearsNo. of eventsPerson-yearsHR (95% CI)P
 DOAC Warfarin   
Rivaroxaban vs warfarin 66 2085 160 4156 0.73 (0.53, 1.01) .06 
Dabigatran vs warfarin 28 3217 281 8734 0.38 (0.25, 0.57) <.0001 
Apixaban vs warfarin 541 67 1407 0.14 (0.03, 0.59) .008 
 DOAC Rivaroxaban   
Dabigatran vs rivaroxaban 961 15 997 0.37 (0.11, 1.21) .10 
Apixaban vs rivaroxaban 558 43 1004 0.08 (0.02, 0.35) .0008 

Adjusted for age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, prior history of the outcome, and HDPS. Bold values represent statistical significance.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal