Table 1.

Risk group assignments of younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the more frequent cytogenetic findings.

Bold type denotes chromosome aberrations whose prognostic impact is agreed on by major studies.1 3  
* No clonal abnormality detected in 20 or more fully analyzed marrow metaphase cells. 
† Would be included in “abn 11q” group and classified in the adverse-risk category by Slovak et al.2  
‡ Classified in the adverse-risk category by Slovak et al.2  
§ Would be included in “abn 20q” group and classified in the adverse-risk category by Slovak et al.2  
|| Classified in the adverse-risk category with respect to overall survival by Byrd et al.3  
¶ Defined as the presence of 3 or more abnormalities in karyotypes not including inv(16), t(16;16), t(8;21), t(15;17) or t(9;11). 
# Classified in the intermediate-risk category by virtue of being “other structural” abnormality by Grimwade et al.1 In a study of Byrd et al.3 included in the intermediate-risk category only with respect to probability of achievement of CR. 
** Would be included in “abnormal 11q23” group and classified in the intermediate-risk category by Grimwade et al.1 In a study of Byrd et al.3 included in the intermediate-risk category only with regard to probability of achievement of CR. 
†† Classified in the intermediate-risk category with respect to probability of achievement of CR and survival by Byrd et al.3 but only if not part of a complex karyotype. 
Favorable-Risk Group 
Balanced structural rearrangements: t(15;17)(q22;q1221)
 t(8;21)(q22;q22)
 inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) 
Intermediate-Risk Group 
 Normal karyotype
Balanced structural rearrangement: t(9;11)(p22;q23)† 
Unbalanced structural rearrangements: del(7q)‡
 del(9q)‡
 del(11q)†
 del(20q)§ 
Numerical aberrations: Y
 +8||
 +11
 +13
 +21 
Unfavorable-Risk Group 
 Complex karyotype¶ 
Balanced structural rearrangements: inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26)
 t(6;9)(p23;q34) #
 t(6;11)(q27;q23)**
 t(11;19)(q23;p13.1)** 
Unbalanced structural rearrangement: del(5q)†† 
Numerical aberrations: −5
 −7 
Bold type denotes chromosome aberrations whose prognostic impact is agreed on by major studies.1 3  
* No clonal abnormality detected in 20 or more fully analyzed marrow metaphase cells. 
† Would be included in “abn 11q” group and classified in the adverse-risk category by Slovak et al.2  
‡ Classified in the adverse-risk category by Slovak et al.2  
§ Would be included in “abn 20q” group and classified in the adverse-risk category by Slovak et al.2  
|| Classified in the adverse-risk category with respect to overall survival by Byrd et al.3  
¶ Defined as the presence of 3 or more abnormalities in karyotypes not including inv(16), t(16;16), t(8;21), t(15;17) or t(9;11). 
# Classified in the intermediate-risk category by virtue of being “other structural” abnormality by Grimwade et al.1 In a study of Byrd et al.3 included in the intermediate-risk category only with respect to probability of achievement of CR. 
** Would be included in “abnormal 11q23” group and classified in the intermediate-risk category by Grimwade et al.1 In a study of Byrd et al.3 included in the intermediate-risk category only with regard to probability of achievement of CR. 
†† Classified in the intermediate-risk category with respect to probability of achievement of CR and survival by Byrd et al.3 but only if not part of a complex karyotype. 
Favorable-Risk Group 
Balanced structural rearrangements: t(15;17)(q22;q1221)
 t(8;21)(q22;q22)
 inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) 
Intermediate-Risk Group 
 Normal karyotype
Balanced structural rearrangement: t(9;11)(p22;q23)† 
Unbalanced structural rearrangements: del(7q)‡
 del(9q)‡
 del(11q)†
 del(20q)§ 
Numerical aberrations: Y
 +8||
 +11
 +13
 +21 
Unfavorable-Risk Group 
 Complex karyotype¶ 
Balanced structural rearrangements: inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26)
 t(6;9)(p23;q34) #
 t(6;11)(q27;q23)**
 t(11;19)(q23;p13.1)** 
Unbalanced structural rearrangement: del(5q)†† 
Numerical aberrations: −5
 −7 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal