Table 1.

Comparison of phase 3 studies for blinatumomab vs chemotherapy and inotuzumab vs chemotherapy

Blinatumomab44 Inotuzumab50 
Study design Randomized phase 3, open label, 2:1 Randomized phase 3, open label, 1:1 
Prestratification for previous salvage therapy (yes vs no), age <35 vs >35, previous allogeneic HSCT (yes vs no) Pre-stratification for duration of first remission <12 mo vs >12 mo, number of salvage treatments (1st vs 2nd) and age <55 y vs >55 y) 
Patient population Primary refractory, relapse <12 mo after initial treatment, second or greater relapse, relapse after allogeneic HSCT (17%) Patients after 1-2 salvage treatments or with primary induction failure. Relapse after allogeneic HSCT included. 
Investigational treatment (and schedule) Continuous daily infusion:
blinatumomab 9 μg/d during wk 1 of induction, then 28 μg/day; administered via continuous infusion for 28 d with 14 d off in between, cycles 42 d 
Weekly infusion:
inotuzumab weekly; 0.8 mg IV on d 1, 0.5 mg IV d 8, 15; induction = 21-d cycle, subsequent cycles 28 d 
Comparator treatments FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, GCSF) FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, GCSF) 
High dose cytarabine Cytarabine + mitoxantrone 
High dose methotrexate-based regimen High dose cytarabine 
Clofarabine-based regimen 
Number of patients 405 (all included in analysis) 326 (281 in ITT analysis) 
Inclusion of Ph+ patients No Yes 
Response rate (CR + CRh + CRi) vs control 44% (vs 25% in the control) P = .001 80.7% (vs 29.4% in control) P < .004 
% MRD negative (of the responders) 76% (vs 48% in the control) P value not reported 78.4% vs 28.1%, P < .001 
Responses in subgroups (vs control) 1st salvage 52.6% (vs 35.4%) 1st salvage 87.7% (vs 28.8%) 
2nd salvage 39.6% (vs 16.3%) 2nd salvage 66.7% (vs 30.6%) 
3rd or more 34.8% (vs 11.5%) Previous allogeneic HSCT 76.5% (vs 27.3%) 
Previous allogeneic HSCT 40.4% (10.9%) No prior transplant 81.5% (vs 29.9%) 
No prior transplant 45.8% (vs 31.8%) BM blasts <50%-86.7% (vs 41.4%) 
BM blasts <50% 65.5% (vs 34.2%) BM blasts >50%-77.9% (vs 24.4%) 
BM blasts >50% 34.4% (vs 24.6%) Age <55 y 80.3% (vs 31.9%) 
Age <35 43.1% (vs 25.0%) Age >55 y 81.4% (vs 25.0%) 
Age >35 44.6% (vs 24.3%) Ph+ ALL vs normal karyotype 78.6% (vs 44.4%)* 
t4; 11) vs normal karyotype 33.3% (vs 33.3%)* 
Survival, PFS, and OS PFS: 7.3 mo blinatumomab vs 4.6 mo control PFS: 5.0 mo inotuzumab vs 1.8 mo control P < .001 
OS: 7.7 mo blinatumomab vs 4.0 mo control P = 0.01 OS: 7.7 mo vs 6.7 in control P = .04 
Unique treatment-related toxicities Neurologic toxicity 6% blinatumomab vs none in control group Veno-occlusive disease 11% inotuzumab vs 1% control 
CRS in 5% of blinatumomab vs none in control group 
Subsequent transplant-related outcomes All patients: 24% in the blinatumomab group vs 24% in the control group All patients: 41% inotuzumab vs 11% controls P < .001 
OS after transplant: 74% blinatumomab vs 75% control Duration of remission transplant 5.5 mo. INO vs 5.7 mo control 
Blinatumomab44 Inotuzumab50 
Study design Randomized phase 3, open label, 2:1 Randomized phase 3, open label, 1:1 
Prestratification for previous salvage therapy (yes vs no), age <35 vs >35, previous allogeneic HSCT (yes vs no) Pre-stratification for duration of first remission <12 mo vs >12 mo, number of salvage treatments (1st vs 2nd) and age <55 y vs >55 y) 
Patient population Primary refractory, relapse <12 mo after initial treatment, second or greater relapse, relapse after allogeneic HSCT (17%) Patients after 1-2 salvage treatments or with primary induction failure. Relapse after allogeneic HSCT included. 
Investigational treatment (and schedule) Continuous daily infusion:
blinatumomab 9 μg/d during wk 1 of induction, then 28 μg/day; administered via continuous infusion for 28 d with 14 d off in between, cycles 42 d 
Weekly infusion:
inotuzumab weekly; 0.8 mg IV on d 1, 0.5 mg IV d 8, 15; induction = 21-d cycle, subsequent cycles 28 d 
Comparator treatments FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, GCSF) FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, GCSF) 
High dose cytarabine Cytarabine + mitoxantrone 
High dose methotrexate-based regimen High dose cytarabine 
Clofarabine-based regimen 
Number of patients 405 (all included in analysis) 326 (281 in ITT analysis) 
Inclusion of Ph+ patients No Yes 
Response rate (CR + CRh + CRi) vs control 44% (vs 25% in the control) P = .001 80.7% (vs 29.4% in control) P < .004 
% MRD negative (of the responders) 76% (vs 48% in the control) P value not reported 78.4% vs 28.1%, P < .001 
Responses in subgroups (vs control) 1st salvage 52.6% (vs 35.4%) 1st salvage 87.7% (vs 28.8%) 
2nd salvage 39.6% (vs 16.3%) 2nd salvage 66.7% (vs 30.6%) 
3rd or more 34.8% (vs 11.5%) Previous allogeneic HSCT 76.5% (vs 27.3%) 
Previous allogeneic HSCT 40.4% (10.9%) No prior transplant 81.5% (vs 29.9%) 
No prior transplant 45.8% (vs 31.8%) BM blasts <50%-86.7% (vs 41.4%) 
BM blasts <50% 65.5% (vs 34.2%) BM blasts >50%-77.9% (vs 24.4%) 
BM blasts >50% 34.4% (vs 24.6%) Age <55 y 80.3% (vs 31.9%) 
Age <35 43.1% (vs 25.0%) Age >55 y 81.4% (vs 25.0%) 
Age >35 44.6% (vs 24.3%) Ph+ ALL vs normal karyotype 78.6% (vs 44.4%)* 
t4; 11) vs normal karyotype 33.3% (vs 33.3%)* 
Survival, PFS, and OS PFS: 7.3 mo blinatumomab vs 4.6 mo control PFS: 5.0 mo inotuzumab vs 1.8 mo control P < .001 
OS: 7.7 mo blinatumomab vs 4.0 mo control P = 0.01 OS: 7.7 mo vs 6.7 in control P = .04 
Unique treatment-related toxicities Neurologic toxicity 6% blinatumomab vs none in control group Veno-occlusive disease 11% inotuzumab vs 1% control 
CRS in 5% of blinatumomab vs none in control group 
Subsequent transplant-related outcomes All patients: 24% in the blinatumomab group vs 24% in the control group All patients: 41% inotuzumab vs 11% controls P < .001 
OS after transplant: 74% blinatumomab vs 75% control Duration of remission transplant 5.5 mo. INO vs 5.7 mo control 

CRS, cytokine release syndrome; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; ITT, intention to treat; PFS, progression-free survival.

*

No significant difference between inotuzumab and control group.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal