Table 2.

Reported studies focused on ASCT in PCNSL

RefN*Median age (range), yTherapy lineTherapy (induction→intensification)CRR to induction,† %Transplanted patients,† %Conditioning regimenWBRTMedian follow-up, moOS, y (%)Neuro toxicity,† %TRM,† %
60  22 53 (27–64) Salvage ARAC+VP16 36 91 Bu/TT/Cy No 41 3 (64) 32 
61  43 52 (23–65) Salvage ARAC+VP16 35 63 Bu/TT/Cy No 36 2 (45) 12 
62  45 57 (19–72) Salvage ICE 51 40 Bu/TT No 53 5 (40) NR 
63  28 53 (25–71) First HDMTXARAC 29 50 BEAM No 28 2 (55) 
64  25 52 (21–60) First MBVPIFO+ARAC 44 68 BEAM Yes 34 4 (64) 
65  53 (30–66) First MBVPIFO+ARAC 2 of 6 patients 6 of 6 patients§ BEAM Yes 41 2 (40) 2 of 6 patients 0 of 6 patients 
66  11 52 (33–65) First HDMTXARAC 8 of 11 patients 11 of 11 patients§ BUCYE Yesll 25 2 (89) 3 of 11 patients 0 of 11 patients 
67  13 56 (35–65) First MPVARAC 31 46 LEED Yesll 44 3 (76) 
68  23 55 (18–69) First HDMTX# 13 69 Bu/TT Yesll 15 2 (48) 39 13 
19  33 57 (23–67) First R-MPV# 66 81 Bu/TT/Cy No 45 3 (81) 12 
69,70  21 56 (34–69) First MPVARAC 24 100§ Bu/TT/Cy No 60 5 (44) 24 
71  30 54 (27–64) First HDMTXARAC+TT 33 77 BCNU/TT Yes 63 5 (69) 17 
72,73  13 54 (38–67) First HDMTXARAC+TT 31 85 BCNU/TT Yesll 72 5 (77) 
16  38 55 (25–60) First R-MBVPR-ARAC 38 62 Bu/TT/Cy No 33 4 (65) NR 
37  59 58 (26–70) First HDMTX+ARAC±R±TT 54 NR BCNU/TT No 40 2 (71) 
RefN*Median age (range), yTherapy lineTherapy (induction→intensification)CRR to induction,† %Transplanted patients,† %Conditioning regimenWBRTMedian follow-up, moOS, y (%)Neuro toxicity,† %TRM,† %
60  22 53 (27–64) Salvage ARAC+VP16 36 91 Bu/TT/Cy No 41 3 (64) 32 
61  43 52 (23–65) Salvage ARAC+VP16 35 63 Bu/TT/Cy No 36 2 (45) 12 
62  45 57 (19–72) Salvage ICE 51 40 Bu/TT No 53 5 (40) NR 
63  28 53 (25–71) First HDMTXARAC 29 50 BEAM No 28 2 (55) 
64  25 52 (21–60) First MBVPIFO+ARAC 44 68 BEAM Yes 34 4 (64) 
65  53 (30–66) First MBVPIFO+ARAC 2 of 6 patients 6 of 6 patients§ BEAM Yes 41 2 (40) 2 of 6 patients 0 of 6 patients 
66  11 52 (33–65) First HDMTXARAC 8 of 11 patients 11 of 11 patients§ BUCYE Yesll 25 2 (89) 3 of 11 patients 0 of 11 patients 
67  13 56 (35–65) First MPVARAC 31 46 LEED Yesll 44 3 (76) 
68  23 55 (18–69) First HDMTX# 13 69 Bu/TT Yesll 15 2 (48) 39 13 
19  33 57 (23–67) First R-MPV# 66 81 Bu/TT/Cy No 45 3 (81) 12 
69,70  21 56 (34–69) First MPVARAC 24 100§ Bu/TT/Cy No 60 5 (44) 24 
71  30 54 (27–64) First HDMTXARAC+TT 33 77 BCNU/TT Yes 63 5 (69) 17 
72,73  13 54 (38–67) First HDMTXARAC+TT 31 85 BCNU/TT Yesll 72 5 (77) 
16  38 55 (25–60) First R-MBVPR-ARAC 38 62 Bu/TT/Cy No 33 4 (65) NR 
37  59 58 (26–70) First HDMTX+ARAC±R±TT 54 NR BCNU/TT No 40 2 (71) 

Data were updated from reference 41. ARAC, cytarabine; BCNU, carmustine; BEAM, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan; Bu, busulfan; BUCYE, busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide; Cy, cyclophosphamide; HDMTX, high-dose methotrexate; ICE (regimen), ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide; IFO, ifosfamide; LEED, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and melphalan; MBVP (regimen), methotrexate, carmustine, etoposide, and methylprednisolone; MPV (regimen), methotrexate, vincristine, and procarbazine; NR, not reported; R-ARAC, rituximab/cytarabine; Ref, reference; R-MPV (regimen), MPV plus rituximab; TRM, treatment-related mortality; TT, thiotepa; VP16, etoposide.

*Number of assessable patients.

†Values are percentages unless otherwise indicated.

Some patients with relapsed disease were retreated with HD-MTX.

§

Performed ASCT was a selection criterion.

llOnly for patients not achieving a complete remission.

Randomized trials: data regard patients allocated to the ASCT arm.

#

These patients did not receive intensification.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal