Table 1.

Reactivity patterns of monoclonal anti-D

Pattern*Anti-D tested, nPartial D
1-91-37DNBDII1-153DNUDIV type 3
− 
− 
− 
− 
− 
− − − 
10 
11 
6/7 12 
6/7 13 
6/7 15/16 
  − 
6/7 17 
6/7 18 
  − 
6/7 20/21 
  −  
22 
23 − − 
  − − − 
  − − − 
N/A 31 − − 
N/A 32 
N/A 33 
N/A 34 − − 
N/A 35 − 
N/A 36 − 
  − − 
N/A 37 
Pattern*Anti-D tested, nPartial D
1-91-37DNBDII1-153DNUDIV type 3
− 
− 
− 
− 
− 
− − − 
10 
11 
6/7 12 
6/7 13 
6/7 15/16 
  − 
6/7 17 
6/7 18 
  − 
6/7 20/21 
  −  
22 
23 − − 
  − − − 
  − − − 
N/A 31 − − 
N/A 32 
N/A 33 
N/A 34 − − 
N/A 35 − 
N/A 36 − 
  − − 
N/A 37 

N/A indicates not applicable; +, a normal or weak positive result; and −, a negative result.

*

Pattern is as described previously by Lomas et al24 (1-9) and Scott21 (1-37).

A complete listing of the antibodies was published previously13 (Table 2). The following antibodies failed to agglutinate DNB: LOR17-6C7 (epD6), P3F20 (epD18), HIRO-7, HIRO-8 (epD23), NAU6-1G6, and NOU (epD31). In addition, the reactivity of the following anti-Ds differed from that of the majority assigned to the respective epitope: D-90/7, SAL20-12D5, LHM50/2B, BIRMA-DG3 (epD15/16), as well as VOL-3F6 (epD20/21) did not agglutinate DIV type 3; LHM77/64, BIRMA-D6 (epD23), and NAU6-4D5 (epD36) did not agglutinate DNU.

The DNB pattern was established with samples RIR-2 and RIR-3 and the DNU pattern with red cells of the original DNU donor.14 The DIV type 3 data are a reevaluation of the original pattern using a CcDee DIV type 3 donor from our local population.

F1-153

The results depicted for D category II were determined by Scott21 and are shown for comparison.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal