Table 1.

GM-CSF treatment results in increased DC populations in CTCL patients: percentages of DCs per PBMC gated on forward and side light scatter

PatientsGM-CSF treatment% CD123+% CD11c+
No 0.05 0.09 
 Yes 0.11 0.08  
No 0.07 0.16 
 Yes 0.09 0.18  
No 0.01 0.02 
 Yes 0.05 0.06  
No 0.05 0.04 
 Yes 0.09 0.09  
No 0.05 0.02 
 Yes 0.08 0.03  
No 0.04 0.02 
 Yes 0.08 0.12  
No 0.33 0.22 
 Yes 0.84 0.37  
Healthy donor — 0.28 0.29 
PatientsGM-CSF treatment% CD123+% CD11c+
No 0.05 0.09 
 Yes 0.11 0.08  
No 0.07 0.16 
 Yes 0.09 0.18  
No 0.01 0.02 
 Yes 0.05 0.06  
No 0.05 0.04 
 Yes 0.09 0.09  
No 0.05 0.02 
 Yes 0.08 0.03  
No 0.04 0.02 
 Yes 0.08 0.12  
No 0.33 0.22 
 Yes 0.84 0.37  
Healthy donor — 0.28 0.29 

Patients 1 to 6 had medium to high tumor burden; patient 7 had low tumor burden. PBMCs from healthy donors and patients before and at the end of GM-CSF treatment were viably cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen and, before assay, were recovered from liquid N2 and surface stained. PBMCs were excluded of all lineage-positive cells, whereas lineage-negative cells were analyzed for the coexpression HLA-DR and CD11c or CD123. The increase in the number of CD123+ but not CD11c+ cells during GM-CSF treatment in patients (1-6) with medium to high tumor burden was statistically significant (P < .03).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal