Table 2.

The association of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with agricultural pesticides and farming activities according to t(14;18) status




t(14;18)-positive NHL vs control subjects

t(14;18)-negative NHL vs control subjects

Farming status
Control subjects*
Case subjects
OR (95% CI)
Case subjects§
OR (95% CI)
P for difference
Nonfarmers   419   19   2.0 (0.7-5.5)   31   0.7 (0.4-1.3)   .09  
Farmers       
    Never used pesticides   229   5   1.0 (referent)   23   1.0 (referent)   NA  
    Used pesticides   730   37   2.1 (0.8-5.4)   48   0.7 (0.4-1.2)   .04  
        Animal insecticides   417   27   2.6 (1.0-6.9)   27   0.7 (0.4-1.3)   .02  
            Less than 11 y   104   5   2.0 (0.5-7.0)   8   0.9 (0.4-2.0)   .3  
            11 y or more   107   9   3.2 (1.0-10.1)   9   0.9 (0.4-2.1)   .08  
            Missing   206   13   2.8 (1.0-7.9)   10   0.5 (0.2-1.1)   .01  
        Crop insecticides   301   22   3.0 (1.1-8.2)   21   0.7 (0.4-1.4)   .02  
            Less than 12 y   82   4   2.1 (0.5-8.1)   7   0.9 (0.4-2.3)   .3  
            12 y or more   87   9   3.8 (1.2-12.2)   6   0.8 (0.3-2.0)   .03  
            Missing   132   9   3.0 (1.0-9.3)   8   0.6 (0.2-1.4)   .02  
        Herbicides   352   25   2.9 (1.1-7.9)   22   0.7 (0.3-1.2)   .01  
            Less than 17 y   104   7   2.9 (0.9-9.4)   8   0.8 (0.3-2.0)   .09  
            17 y or more   109   9   3.2 (1.0-10.1)   8   0.8 (0.3-1.9)   .06  
            Missing   139   9   3.0 (1.0-9.1)   6   0.4 (0.1-1.1)   .007  
        Fungicides   59   2   NR  3   NR  NA  
        Rodentcides   523   28   2.2 (0.8-5.8)   39   0.8 (0.5-1.4)   .07  
        Fumigants
 
112
 
14
 
5.0 (1.7-14.5)
 
9
 
0.8 (0.3-1.8)
 
.006
 



t(14;18)-positive NHL vs control subjects

t(14;18)-negative NHL vs control subjects

Farming status
Control subjects*
Case subjects
OR (95% CI)
Case subjects§
OR (95% CI)
P for difference
Nonfarmers   419   19   2.0 (0.7-5.5)   31   0.7 (0.4-1.3)   .09  
Farmers       
    Never used pesticides   229   5   1.0 (referent)   23   1.0 (referent)   NA  
    Used pesticides   730   37   2.1 (0.8-5.4)   48   0.7 (0.4-1.2)   .04  
        Animal insecticides   417   27   2.6 (1.0-6.9)   27   0.7 (0.4-1.3)   .02  
            Less than 11 y   104   5   2.0 (0.5-7.0)   8   0.9 (0.4-2.0)   .3  
            11 y or more   107   9   3.2 (1.0-10.1)   9   0.9 (0.4-2.1)   .08  
            Missing   206   13   2.8 (1.0-7.9)   10   0.5 (0.2-1.1)   .01  
        Crop insecticides   301   22   3.0 (1.1-8.2)   21   0.7 (0.4-1.4)   .02  
            Less than 12 y   82   4   2.1 (0.5-8.1)   7   0.9 (0.4-2.3)   .3  
            12 y or more   87   9   3.8 (1.2-12.2)   6   0.8 (0.3-2.0)   .03  
            Missing   132   9   3.0 (1.0-9.3)   8   0.6 (0.2-1.4)   .02  
        Herbicides   352   25   2.9 (1.1-7.9)   22   0.7 (0.3-1.2)   .01  
            Less than 17 y   104   7   2.9 (0.9-9.4)   8   0.8 (0.3-2.0)   .09  
            17 y or more   109   9   3.2 (1.0-10.1)   8   0.8 (0.3-1.9)   .06  
            Missing   139   9   3.0 (1.0-9.1)   6   0.4 (0.1-1.1)   .007  
        Fungicides   59   2   NR  3   NR  NA  
        Rodentcides   523   28   2.2 (0.8-5.8)   39   0.8 (0.5-1.4)   .07  
        Fumigants
 
112
 
14
 
5.0 (1.7-14.5)
 
9
 
0.8 (0.3-1.8)
 
.006
 

NA indicates not applicable; NR, not reported.

*

Numbers may not sum to 1432 because of missing data.

Numbers may not sum to 65 because of missing data.

Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age (4 levels), sex, type of respondent (direct or proxy interview), and family history of cancer (yes or no).

§

Numbers may not sum to 107 because of missing data.

P for difference was computed from polytomous logistic regression by testing the difference of regression coefficients of the usage of pesticides corresponding to t(14;18)-positive versus control subjects and t(14;18)-negative versus control subjects.

Not reported because there were fewer than 4 exposed case subjects.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal