Table 2

Crude and predicted bone age by inhibitor status among HIV adolescents

Chronological age, yCrude bone age
Predicted bone age
95% CI, moP
Without inhibitor, y ± SEWith inhibitor, y ± SEWithout inhibitor, yWith inhibitor, yDifference, mo
11 10.5 ± 0.3 9.8 ± 0.4 10.7 10.0 8.7 2.3, 15.1 .008 
12 12.2 ± 0.2 11.3 ± 0.4 12.0 11.2 9.5 3.0, 16.1 .005 
13 13.0 ± 0.3 11.7 ± 0.5 13.2 12.4 9.9 3.2, 16.6 .004 
14 14.3 ± 0.3 14.7 ± 0.6 14.4 13.6 9.8 2.9, 16.7 .005 
15 15.8 ± 0.3 14.8 ± 0.3 15.5 14.8 9.2 2.2, 16.2 .01 
Chronological age, yCrude bone age
Predicted bone age
95% CI, moP
Without inhibitor, y ± SEWith inhibitor, y ± SEWithout inhibitor, yWith inhibitor, yDifference, mo
11 10.5 ± 0.3 9.8 ± 0.4 10.7 10.0 8.7 2.3, 15.1 .008 
12 12.2 ± 0.2 11.3 ± 0.4 12.0 11.2 9.5 3.0, 16.1 .005 
13 13.0 ± 0.3 11.7 ± 0.5 13.2 12.4 9.9 3.2, 16.6 .004 
14 14.3 ± 0.3 14.7 ± 0.6 14.4 13.6 9.8 2.9, 16.7 .005 
15 15.8 ± 0.3 14.8 ± 0.3 15.5 14.8 9.2 2.2, 16.2 .01 

A total of 319 films from 120 HIV participants were used in the analysis to estimate the predicted bone ages; 10 films from 6 participants were excluded from the analysis because they were skeletally mature at baseline.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal