Table 3

Hematologic response, cytogenetic response, discontinuation for AE, and failure

3 mo,n (%)6 mo, n (%)12 mo, n (%)
No. of patients 73 73 73 
HR    
    Complete 73 (100) 72 (98) 71 (97) 
    Less than complete or lost 1 (1) 1 (1) 
    Nonevaluable 1 (1) 
CgR    
    Complete* 57 (78) 70 (96) 70 (96) 
    Partial (Ph+ 1%-35%) 5 (7) 2 (3) 1 (1) 
    Minor (Ph+ 36%-65%) 5 (7) 
    Minimal (Ph+ 66%-95%) 3 (4) 
    None or lost 1 (1) 1 (1) 
    Nonevaluable 3 (4) 1 (1) 
Discontinued for AEs 1 (1) 
Failure 1 (1) 1 (1) 
3 mo,n (%)6 mo, n (%)12 mo, n (%)
No. of patients 73 73 73 
HR    
    Complete 73 (100) 72 (98) 71 (97) 
    Less than complete or lost 1 (1) 1 (1) 
    Nonevaluable 1 (1) 
CgR    
    Complete* 57 (78) 70 (96) 70 (96) 
    Partial (Ph+ 1%-35%) 5 (7) 2 (3) 1 (1) 
    Minor (Ph+ 36%-65%) 5 (7) 
    Minimal (Ph+ 66%-95%) 3 (4) 
    None or lost 1 (1) 1 (1) 
    Nonevaluable 3 (4) 1 (1) 
Discontinued for AEs 1 (1) 
Failure 1 (1) 1 (1) 

All rates are calculated on all 73 patients, according to the intention-to-treat principle.

HR indicates hematologic response; and CgR, cytogenetic response.

*

The assessment of CCgR was based on CBA of marrow cell metaphases in 90%, 85% and 80% of patients. It was based on I-FISH in 10%, 15%, and 20% of patients.

This patient was in CHR and CCgR at 3 months, but developed sudden BC (lymphoid, with the T315I mutation) and died at 9 months.

This patient discontinued nilotinib after 9 months, for persistent lipase increase, grade 3/4 (no pancreatitis).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal