Table 1

Multivariable analysis on the relative risk of major thrombosis among 1063 ET patients11 

8.0-11.0 × 109/L white blood cell count* (n = 432)
More than 11.0 × 109/L white blood cell count* (n = 220)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)PHazard ratio (95% CI)P
Major thrombosis 
    (1) Unadjusted 1.3 (0.8-1.9) .3 1.7 (1.0-2.7) .04 
    (2) Variables adjusted 1.4 (0.9-2.1) .2 1.8 (1.1-2.9) .02 
    (3) +JAK2V617F adjusted 1.5 (0.9-2.5) .1 2.0 (1.1-3.6) .02 
8.0-11.0 × 109/L white blood cell count* (n = 432)
More than 11.0 × 109/L white blood cell count* (n = 220)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)PHazard ratio (95% CI)P
Major thrombosis 
    (1) Unadjusted 1.3 (0.8-1.9) .3 1.7 (1.0-2.7) .04 
    (2) Variables adjusted 1.4 (0.9-2.1) .2 1.8 (1.1-2.9) .02 
    (3) +JAK2V617F adjusted 1.5 (0.9-2.5) .1 2.0 (1.1-3.6) .02 

Model 1: platelet count (3 categories) or white blood cell count (3 categories).

Model 2: model 1 plus center (3 categories), sex (2 categories), standard risk factors: age 60 years or older and/or previous thrombotic event (yes/no), hemoglobin at diagnosis (2 categories, median value used as cutoff), white blood cell count or platelet count at diagnosis (2 categories, median value used as cutoff), antiplatelet use (yes/no), chemotherapy use (yes/no).

Model 3: model 2 plus JAK2V617F status (yes/no).

*

Reference categories: white blood cell count lower than 8 ×109/L. Cutoffs arbitrarily defined.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal