Table 1

Randomized evaluations of the impact of acetaminophen on the pharmacodynamics of warfarin

Study, periodStudy sizeAcetaminophen doseStudy outcome
Antlitz,16  1968 20 650 mg vs placebo for 2 doses No significant difference in prothrombin times between acetaminophen and placebo during the 48-hour period after 2 doses of study drug. 
Mahé,17  2004 11 4 g/d vs placebo for 14 d The mean observed INR was significantly increased after 4 days in the acetaminophen group. The mean maximum INR observed was 3.47 in the acetaminophen arm and 2.61 in the placebo arm (P = .001). The mean maximum increase in the INR was 1.04 (acetaminophen group) versus 0.20 (placebo group; P = .003). 
Mahé,18  2006 20 4 g/d vs placebo for 14 d The mean maximum INR observed was 3.45 in the acetaminophen arm and 2.66 in the placebo arm (P = .03). The mean maximum increase in the INR was 1.20 (acetaminophen group) versus 0.37 (placebo group; P < .001). Significant reductions in the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X accompanied the increase in INR. 
Parra,19  2007 36 2 g/d, 4 g/d; vs placebo for 4 wk At week 2, the 2 g/d group had significantly higher INR compared with placebo (P = .01). At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the 4 g/d group had significantly higher INR than placebo (P = .04, P = .01, and P = .01, respectively). 
Zhang,20  2011 45 2 g/d, 3 g/d; vs placebo for 10 d The mean INR increase was 0.70, 0.67, and 0.14 in the 2 g/d group, 3 g/d group, and in the placebo group, respectively (P = .01). Factor VII levels were lower in the acetaminophen groups compared with placebo, but not levels of factors II and V. 
Study, periodStudy sizeAcetaminophen doseStudy outcome
Antlitz,16  1968 20 650 mg vs placebo for 2 doses No significant difference in prothrombin times between acetaminophen and placebo during the 48-hour period after 2 doses of study drug. 
Mahé,17  2004 11 4 g/d vs placebo for 14 d The mean observed INR was significantly increased after 4 days in the acetaminophen group. The mean maximum INR observed was 3.47 in the acetaminophen arm and 2.61 in the placebo arm (P = .001). The mean maximum increase in the INR was 1.04 (acetaminophen group) versus 0.20 (placebo group; P = .003). 
Mahé,18  2006 20 4 g/d vs placebo for 14 d The mean maximum INR observed was 3.45 in the acetaminophen arm and 2.66 in the placebo arm (P = .03). The mean maximum increase in the INR was 1.20 (acetaminophen group) versus 0.37 (placebo group; P < .001). Significant reductions in the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X accompanied the increase in INR. 
Parra,19  2007 36 2 g/d, 4 g/d; vs placebo for 4 wk At week 2, the 2 g/d group had significantly higher INR compared with placebo (P = .01). At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the 4 g/d group had significantly higher INR than placebo (P = .04, P = .01, and P = .01, respectively). 
Zhang,20  2011 45 2 g/d, 3 g/d; vs placebo for 10 d The mean INR increase was 0.70, 0.67, and 0.14 in the 2 g/d group, 3 g/d group, and in the placebo group, respectively (P = .01). Factor VII levels were lower in the acetaminophen groups compared with placebo, but not levels of factors II and V. 

INR indicates international normalized ratio.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal