Table 5

Evaluation of RASGRP1/APTX ratio treatment specificity: characteristics of patients receiving (phase 2) and not receiving (specificity) tipifarnib-based induction therapy for newly diagnosed AML

Phase 2 (n = 40)Specificity (n = 41)
Sex (male/female) 21/19 19/22 
Median age, y (range) 77 (70-90) 58 (21-71) 
Therapy T + E Ara-C, anthracycline, and third agent (flavopiridol or etoposide) 
Cytogenetics, no. (%)   
    Favorable 5 (10) 
    Normal 12 (30) 15 (37) 
    Intermediate 2 (5) 4 (10) 
    Adverse 26 (65) 17 (41) 
FLT3-ITD, no. (%)* 9 (22) 
Response, no. (%)   
    CR 11 (28) 25 (61) 
    PR/HI 9 (22) 
    Overall 20 (50) 25 (61) 
Phase 2 (n = 40)Specificity (n = 41)
Sex (male/female) 21/19 19/22 
Median age, y (range) 77 (70-90) 58 (21-71) 
Therapy T + E Ara-C, anthracycline, and third agent (flavopiridol or etoposide) 
Cytogenetics, no. (%)   
    Favorable 5 (10) 
    Normal 12 (30) 15 (37) 
    Intermediate 2 (5) 4 (10) 
    Adverse 26 (65) 17 (41) 
FLT3-ITD, no. (%)* 9 (22) 
Response, no. (%)   
    CR 11 (28) 25 (61) 
    PR/HI 9 (22) 
    Overall 20 (50) 25 (61) 
*

All FLT3-ITD+ patients had normal cytogenetics.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal