Table 1

Clinical features of the series

Screening setTest set (n = 240 patients)
TrainingPValidationRelative risk of death, OS (95%CI)Relative risk of progression, PFS (95% CI)
Number of patients 36 123  117   
IPI factors       
Age, y   .004  2.406 (1.298-4.462); P = .005 1.238 (0.758-2.021); P = .394 
    ≤ 60 13 61  35   
    > 60 23 62  79   
Stage   .5  2.221 (1.213-4.067); P = .01 3.287 (1.823-5.927); P = .000 
    I-II 55  43   
    III-IV 28 68  65   
Lactate dehydrogenase   .112  3.13 (1.53-6.43); P = .001 3.051 (1.66-5.608); P = .000 
    low 10 56  28   
    high 26 67  55   
Performance status   .87  2.265 (1.306-3.929); P = .004 1.956 (1.182-3.238); P = .009 
    Ambulatory (0-1) 29 90  56   
    Not ambulatory (2-4) 33  22   
Extranodal site involvement   .49  2.012 (1.135-3.565); P = .017 2.197 (1.315-3.670); P = .003 
    ≤ 1 site 28 96  57   
    > 1 site 27  21   
IPI score (number of IPI factors)   .067  1.690 (1.378-2.073); P = .000 1.479 (1.244-1.758); P = .000 
    Low risk (0,1) 46  33   
    Low to intermediate risk (2) 10 24  25   
    Intermediate to high risk (3) 12 29  26   
    High risk (4,5) 22  28   
Screening setTest set (n = 240 patients)
TrainingPValidationRelative risk of death, OS (95%CI)Relative risk of progression, PFS (95% CI)
Number of patients 36 123  117   
IPI factors       
Age, y   .004  2.406 (1.298-4.462); P = .005 1.238 (0.758-2.021); P = .394 
    ≤ 60 13 61  35   
    > 60 23 62  79   
Stage   .5  2.221 (1.213-4.067); P = .01 3.287 (1.823-5.927); P = .000 
    I-II 55  43   
    III-IV 28 68  65   
Lactate dehydrogenase   .112  3.13 (1.53-6.43); P = .001 3.051 (1.66-5.608); P = .000 
    low 10 56  28   
    high 26 67  55   
Performance status   .87  2.265 (1.306-3.929); P = .004 1.956 (1.182-3.238); P = .009 
    Ambulatory (0-1) 29 90  56   
    Not ambulatory (2-4) 33  22   
Extranodal site involvement   .49  2.012 (1.135-3.565); P = .017 2.197 (1.315-3.670); P = .003 
    ≤ 1 site 28 96  57   
    > 1 site 27  21   
IPI score (number of IPI factors)   .067  1.690 (1.378-2.073); P = .000 1.479 (1.244-1.758); P = .000 
    Low risk (0,1) 46  33   
    Low to intermediate risk (2) 10 24  25   
    Intermediate to high risk (3) 12 29  26   
    High risk (4,5) 22  28   

Distribution of IPI factors in the whole series is shown. The χ2 test was used to assess differences in the proportions of individual prognostic factors between the training and validation sets of patients. Relative risk of event (OS and PFS) estimated from univariate Cox regression is shown for each IPI factor in the test set of patients.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal