Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with early-stage, gastric DLBCL with and without histologic evidence of MALT origin

Frontline treatmentPure (de novo) DLBCL
DLBCL(MALT)
P*
Chemotherapy, n = 30Antibiotics, n = 16Antibiotics, n = 34
Clinicopathologic characteristics     
Median age, y (range) 65 (20-87) 63 (34-88) 55 (35-83) .283 
Sex, male/female 16/14 6/10 12/22 .312 
Stage    .022 
    IE, n (%) 19 (63.3) 9 (56.3) 30 (88.3)  
    IIE1, n (%) 11 (36.7) 7 (43.8) 4 (11.7)  
Endoscopic features, n (%)    .537§ 
    Gastritis-like or multiple erosion on infiltrative mucosa 7 (23.3) 3 (18.8) 11 (32.4)  
    Ulceration or ulcerated mass 18 (60.0) 11 (68.8) 18 (52.9)  
    Erosions on giant nodular folds 3 (10.0) 1 (6.3) 3 (8.8)  
    Mixed 2 (6.7) 1 (6.3) 2 (5.9)  
Location of tumor(s), n (%)    .790§ 
    Antrum 12 (40.6) 6 (37.5) 10 (29.4)  
    Angularis 1 (3.3) 0 (0) 3 (8.8)  
    Middle body, lower body, or both 7 (23.3) 5 (31.3) 8 (23.5)  
    Upper body, fundus, or both 3 (10.0) 1 (6.3) 3 (8.8)  
    ≥ 2 components 7 (23.3) 4 (25.0) 10 (29.4)  
Depth of gastric wall involvement, n (%)    .831 
    Submucosa or above 9/22 (40.9) 5/16 (31.2) 10/27 (37.0)  
    Muscularis propria or beyond 13/22 (59.1) 11/16 (68.8) 17/27 (63.0)  
Initial pathologic features, n (%)     
    DLBCL without MALT lymphoma 30 (100) 16 (100)   
    MALT lymphoma with foci of large-cell aggregations   19 (55.9)  
    DLBCL with foci of CCL, LEL, or both   15 (44.1)  
Frontline treatmentPure (de novo) DLBCL
DLBCL(MALT)
P*
Chemotherapy, n = 30Antibiotics, n = 16Antibiotics, n = 34
Clinicopathologic characteristics     
Median age, y (range) 65 (20-87) 63 (34-88) 55 (35-83) .283 
Sex, male/female 16/14 6/10 12/22 .312 
Stage    .022 
    IE, n (%) 19 (63.3) 9 (56.3) 30 (88.3)  
    IIE1, n (%) 11 (36.7) 7 (43.8) 4 (11.7)  
Endoscopic features, n (%)    .537§ 
    Gastritis-like or multiple erosion on infiltrative mucosa 7 (23.3) 3 (18.8) 11 (32.4)  
    Ulceration or ulcerated mass 18 (60.0) 11 (68.8) 18 (52.9)  
    Erosions on giant nodular folds 3 (10.0) 1 (6.3) 3 (8.8)  
    Mixed 2 (6.7) 1 (6.3) 2 (5.9)  
Location of tumor(s), n (%)    .790§ 
    Antrum 12 (40.6) 6 (37.5) 10 (29.4)  
    Angularis 1 (3.3) 0 (0) 3 (8.8)  
    Middle body, lower body, or both 7 (23.3) 5 (31.3) 8 (23.5)  
    Upper body, fundus, or both 3 (10.0) 1 (6.3) 3 (8.8)  
    ≥ 2 components 7 (23.3) 4 (25.0) 10 (29.4)  
Depth of gastric wall involvement, n (%)    .831 
    Submucosa or above 9/22 (40.9) 5/16 (31.2) 10/27 (37.0)  
    Muscularis propria or beyond 13/22 (59.1) 11/16 (68.8) 17/27 (63.0)  
Initial pathologic features, n (%)     
    DLBCL without MALT lymphoma 30 (100) 16 (100)   
    MALT lymphoma with foci of large-cell aggregations   19 (55.9)  
    DLBCL with foci of CCL, LEL, or both   15 (44.1)  

LEL indicates lymphoepithelial lesions.

*

Comparison of discrete variables between pure (de novo) DLBCL and DLBCL(MALT).

P values (2-sided) were calculated using the Student t test.

P values (2-sided) were calculated using the Fisher exact test.

§

P values (2-sided) were calculated using 1-way ANOVA.

Gastric wall involvement was evaluated in 65 patients in total. Evaluation was by endoscopic ultrasonography in 64 patients and by histologic examination of surgical specimen in one gastric DLBCL(MALT) patient.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal