Effect of GO on transcript levels in CBF AML patients after course 1 of treatment
| . | GO . | No GO . | P . |
|---|---|---|---|
| t(8;21) < 1 log reduction | 0 | 1 | .04 |
| t(8;21) 1-3 log reduction | 5 | 10 | |
| t(8;21) > 3 log reduction | 9 | 4 | |
| inv(16) < 10 copies | 6 | 5 | 1.0 |
| inv(16) 10-500 copies | 3 | 5 | |
| inv(16) > 500 copies | 2 | 1 |
| . | GO . | No GO . | P . |
|---|---|---|---|
| t(8;21) < 1 log reduction | 0 | 1 | .04 |
| t(8;21) 1-3 log reduction | 5 | 10 | |
| t(8;21) > 3 log reduction | 9 | 4 | |
| inv(16) < 10 copies | 6 | 5 | 1.0 |
| inv(16) 10-500 copies | 3 | 5 | |
| inv(16) > 500 copies | 2 | 1 |