Clinical characteristics of patients whose samples were used in this analysis
. | GVHD . | NONE . | P . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
n | 26 | 27 | ||
Disease, n (%) | .35 | |||
AML | 17 (65) | 11 (41) | ||
ALL | 3 (12) | 5 (19) | ||
Lymphoma | 4 (15) | 8 (30) | ||
Other | 2 (8) | 3 (11) | ||
Conditioning, n (%) | .91 | |||
Myeloablative | 11 (42) | 11 (41) | ||
Reduced intensity | 15 (58) | 16 (59) | ||
Donor, n (%) | .21 | |||
Related | 17 (65) | 13 (48) | ||
Unrelated | 9 (35) | 14 (52) | ||
GVHD ppx, n (%) | .40 | |||
CNI/MTX | 13 (50) | 17 (63) | ||
CNI/ATG/ MTX | 7 (27) | 5 (19) | ||
CNI/Siro ± MTX | 4 (15) | 5 (19) | ||
Other* | 2 (8) | 0 (0) | ||
Day of sample after HCT or DLI, median (range) | 47 (23-183) | 73 (20-98) | .14 | |
GVHD | Gut (n = 12) | Skin (n = 14) | ||
Grade 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Grade 2 | 8 | 6 | ||
Grade 3 | 0 | 8 | ||
Grade 4 | 3 | 0 |
. | GVHD . | NONE . | P . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
n | 26 | 27 | ||
Disease, n (%) | .35 | |||
AML | 17 (65) | 11 (41) | ||
ALL | 3 (12) | 5 (19) | ||
Lymphoma | 4 (15) | 8 (30) | ||
Other | 2 (8) | 3 (11) | ||
Conditioning, n (%) | .91 | |||
Myeloablative | 11 (42) | 11 (41) | ||
Reduced intensity | 15 (58) | 16 (59) | ||
Donor, n (%) | .21 | |||
Related | 17 (65) | 13 (48) | ||
Unrelated | 9 (35) | 14 (52) | ||
GVHD ppx, n (%) | .40 | |||
CNI/MTX | 13 (50) | 17 (63) | ||
CNI/ATG/ MTX | 7 (27) | 5 (19) | ||
CNI/Siro ± MTX | 4 (15) | 5 (19) | ||
Other* | 2 (8) | 0 (0) | ||
Day of sample after HCT or DLI, median (range) | 47 (23-183) | 73 (20-98) | .14 | |
GVHD | Gut (n = 12) | Skin (n = 14) | ||
Grade 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Grade 2 | 8 | 6 | ||
Grade 3 | 0 | 8 | ||
Grade 4 | 3 | 0 |
ALL indicates acute lymphoid leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor, specifically cyclosporine or tacrolimus; DLI, donor leukocyte infusion; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; MTX, methotrexate; ppx, prophylaxis; and Siro, sirolimus.
For other GVHD prophylaxis regimens, 2 patients received alemtuzumab during conditioning. One patient received tacrolimus after HCT and the other received mycophenolate mofetil alone.